IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11685-d916745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The National Outcomes Evaluation Programme in Italy: The Impact of Publication of Health Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Paola Colais

    (Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, 00147 Rome, Italy)

  • Luigi Pinnarelli

    (Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, 00147 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesca Mataloni

    (Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, 00147 Rome, Italy)

  • Barbara Giordani

    (Research and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services (AGENAS), 00187 Rome, Italy)

  • Giorgia Duranti

    (Research and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services (AGENAS), 00187 Rome, Italy)

  • Paola D’Errigo

    (National Centre for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Stefano Rosato

    (National Centre for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Fulvia Seccareccia

    (National Centre for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Giovanni Baglio

    (Research and International Relations Unit, Italian National Agency for Regional Healthcare Services (AGENAS), 00187 Rome, Italy)

  • Marina Davoli

    (Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, 00147 Rome, Italy
    Membership of the Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.)

Abstract

In Italy the National Outcomes Evaluation Programme, (P.N.E.) is the most comprehensive comparative evaluation of healthcare outcomes at the national level. The aim of this report is to describe the P.N.E. and some of the most relevant results achieved. The P.N.E. analysed 184 indicators on quality of care in 2015–2020 period. The data sources are the Italian Health Information Systems. The indicators reported were: proportion of surgery within 2 days after hip fracture in the elderly (HF), 30-day mortality after hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), proportion of reoperations within 90 days of breast-conserving surgery and proportion of primary caesarean deliveries. Risk adjustment methods were used to take into account patients’ characteristics. From 2010 to 2020 the proportion of interventions within 2 days after HF increased from 31.3% to 64.6%, the AMI 30-day mortality decreased from 10.4% to 8.3%, the proportion of reinterventions within 90 days of breast-conserving surgery decreased from 12.0% to 5.9% and the proportion of primary caesarean deliveries decreased from 28.4% to 22.7%. Results by area of residence showed heterogeneity of healthcare quality. We observed a general improvement in different clinical areas not always associated with a reduction of heterogeneity among areas of residence.

Suggested Citation

  • Paola Colais & Luigi Pinnarelli & Francesca Mataloni & Barbara Giordani & Giorgia Duranti & Paola D’Errigo & Stefano Rosato & Fulvia Seccareccia & Giovanni Baglio & Marina Davoli, 2022. "The National Outcomes Evaluation Programme in Italy: The Impact of Publication of Health Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11685-:d:916745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11685/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11685/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11685-:d:916745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.