IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11549-d914376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freedive Training Gives Additional Physiological Effect Compared to Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD

Author

Listed:
  • Zoltán Csizmadia

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Pongrác Ács

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary)

  • Gergő József Szőllősi

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Blanka Tóth

    (Department of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, 1122 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Mária Kerti

    (Department of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, 1122 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Antal Kovács

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary)

  • János Tamás Varga

    (Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is beneficial for lung mechanics, chest kinematics, metabolism, and inspiratory and peripheral muscle function. Freediving training (FD) can be effective in sportsmen and can improve breath-holding time. Aims: We sought to determine the effectiveness of freediving training in the pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients. Patients and methods: Twenty-three COPD patients (15 men and 8 women; median age 63 years; FEV1: 41% pred; BMI: 28 kg/m 2 ) participated in the FD + PR group (3 weeks PR and 3 weeks FD + PR) and 46 patients with COPD (25 men and 21 women; median age 66 years; FEV1: 43% pred; BMI: 27 kg/m 2 ) participated in an inpatient PR program (6 weeks). Patients performed comfort zone breath holding for 30 min/day. Patients increased their breath-holding time within their comfort zone for 30 min. We detected lung function, chest expansion (CWE), inspiratory muscle pressure (MIP), peripheral muscle function (GS), and exercise capacity (6MWD), and we included breath-holding time (BHT), quality of life score (COPD Assessment Test (CAT)), modified Medical Research Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) score, and the severity of the disease assessed by the BODE index (FEV1, BMI, 6MWD, and mMRC) and an alternative scale (FEV1, BMI, 6MWD, and CAT). Result: There were significant differences in the characteristics of the two groups. Significant improvement was detected in all functional and quality of life parameters except lung function in both groups. Significantly higher improvement was detected in CWE, GS, 6MWD, BHT, CAT, mMRC, alternative scale, and MIP. The improvement in forced vital capacity (FVC) was not significant. There were no side effects of FD training. Conclusion: The FD method can potentiate the effect of PR, improving not only BHT but also other parameters. Trial registration: ISRCTN ISRCTN13019180. Registered 19 December 2017.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoltán Csizmadia & Pongrác Ács & Gergő József Szőllősi & Blanka Tóth & Mária Kerti & Antal Kovács & János Tamás Varga, 2022. "Freedive Training Gives Additional Physiological Effect Compared to Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11549-:d:914376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11549-:d:914376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.