IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11322-d910442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the Norma Latina Neuropsychological Assessment Battery in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Núñez-Fernández

    (Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
    Neuroscience Institute of Castilla-León, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Diego Rivera

    (Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
    Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain)

  • Eva María Arroyo-Anlló

    (Department of Psychobiology, Neuroscience Institute of Castilla-León, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Xóchitl Angélica Ortiz Jiménez

    (Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Monterrey 64460, Mexico)

  • Borja Camino-Pontes

    (Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
    Biomedical Research Doctorate Program, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain)

  • Ricardo Salinas Martínez

    (Department of Geriatrics, “José Eleuterio González” University Hospital, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Monterrey 64460, Mexico)

  • Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla

    (Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Richmond, VA 23284, USA)

Abstract

To our knowledge, this is the first study reported in the literature that has validated the Norma Latina Battery in a population of people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in Mexico. The objective of the study was to determine the discriminant validity of the Norma Latina Battery in a group of Mexican individuals with AD and a group of heathy controls (HC). The Norma Latina Battery was administered to 234 Mexican participants (117 HC and 117 individuals with AD). Results show that: (1) the Norma Latina Battery has high discriminative capacity between groups in all domains; (2) participants with AD presented worse scores in each of the cognitive domains compared to the HC and a greater number of low scores in each of the established thresholds or cut-off points; and finally, (3) the Norma Latina Battery had optimal sensitivity and specificity, especially when a set was observed ≥5 scores below the 10th percentile or ≥4 scores below the 5th percentile. In conclusion, it is recommended that both clinicians and researchers use this battery in the evaluation of Mexican people with AD to better understand the prognosis of the disease and its subsequent treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Núñez-Fernández & Diego Rivera & Eva María Arroyo-Anlló & Xóchitl Angélica Ortiz Jiménez & Borja Camino-Pontes & Ricardo Salinas Martínez & Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, 2022. "Validation of the Norma Latina Neuropsychological Assessment Battery in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease in Mexico," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11322-:d:910442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11322/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11322/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teresita Villaseñor-Cabrera & Joan Guàrdia-Olmos & Miriam Jiménez-Maldonado & Genoveva Rizo-Curiel & Maribel Peró-Cebollero, 2010. "Sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Mental State Examination in the Mexican population," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1105-1112, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11322-:d:910442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.