IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11254-d909155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Considerations to the Introduction of Intergenerational Practice to Australian Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Katrina Radford

    (Department of Employment Relations and Human Resource Management, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, Australia)

  • Janna Anneke Fitzgerald

    (Department of Business, Strategy and Innovation, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia)

  • Nerina Vecchio

    (Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia)

  • Jennifer Cartmel

    (Department of Social Work and Human Services, Griffith University, Logan 4131, Australia)

  • Ryan Bruce Gould

    (Department of Employment Relations and Human Resource Management, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, Australia)

  • Jennifer Kosiol

    (School of Applied Psychology—Health Service Management, Griffith University, Brisbane 4101, Australia)

Abstract

Intergenerational practice programs provide purposeful interactions between generations. While research reports improved social and behavioral outcomes for cohorts, no study has explored both expert and potential consumer perceptions of the implementation of intergenerational practice programs. This study conducted a Delphi study of expert opinions, as well as a national survey of potential consumers (N = 1020), to provide critical insights into the potential barriers to implementing intergenerational practice programs. Results revealed that 71.3% of potential consumers would participate in intergenerational practice programs if they were available and experts agreed that the program was of benefit to both populations. However, there were shared concerns regarding the transport, safety, and outcomes of the program for participants. Based on our findings we offer several policy considerations in the implementation of intergenerational programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrina Radford & Janna Anneke Fitzgerald & Nerina Vecchio & Jennifer Cartmel & Ryan Bruce Gould & Jennifer Kosiol, 2022. "Key Considerations to the Introduction of Intergenerational Practice to Australian Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11254-:d:909155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enid Schatz & Janet Seeley & Flavia Zalwango, 2018. "Intergenerational care for and by children: Examining reciprocity through focus group interviews with older adults in rural Uganda," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(63), pages 2003-2026.
    2. Ya‐Fen Lien & Hui‐Man Huang, 2017. "Challenges in intergenerational caregiving for frail older people: A multiple case study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 81-87, March.
    3. Jieyu Liu & Joanne Cook, 2020. "Ageing and intergenerational care in rural China: a qualitative study of policy development," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 378-391, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Araviinthansai Subramaniam & Kalyani Kirtikar Mehta, 2024. "Exploring the Lived Experiences of Caregiving for Older Family Members by Young Caregivers in Singapore: Transition, Trials, and Tribulations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1, February.
    2. Olivia Samuel & Véronique Hertrich, 2019. "Introduction to the Special Collection on ‘Children and family dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa’," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(44), pages 1269-1276.
    3. Manee Arpanantikul, 2018. "Women's perspectives on home‐based care for family members with chronic illness: An Interpretive phenomenology study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 494-501, December.
    4. Min Qin & Jane Falkingham & Maria Evandrou & Athina Vlachantoni, 2020. "Attitudes and preferences towards future old-age support amongst tomorrow’s elders in China," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(11), pages 285-314.
    5. Chika Tanimura & Hiromi Matsumoto & Yasuko Tokushima & Junko Yoshimura & Shinji Tanishima & Hiroshi Hagino, 2018. "Self‐care agency, lifestyle, and physical condition predict future frailty in community‐dwelling older people," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 31-38, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11254-:d:909155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.