IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11238-d908966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welfare and Self-Assessment in Patients after Aesthetic and Reconstructive Treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Edyta Skwirczyńska

    (Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, Pomeranian Medical University, Rybacka 1, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Michał Piotrowiak

    (Department of General and Transplantation Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Marek Ostrowski

    (Department of General and Transplantation Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Oskar Wróblewski

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Karol Tejchman

    (Department of General and Transplantation Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Sebastian Kwiatkowski

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska

    (Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

In the last decade, there has been a noticeable increase in the interest in aesthetic and corrective surgery regardless of a patient’s age. Both aesthetical and practical considerations are a motivation for patients undergoing plastic surgery. The goal of this study is to analyze dependencies between welfare, self-assessment and body self-perception in patients that qualified for plastic and aesthetic surgical procedures. The study group included 164 female patients, of whom 124 patients filled out a questionnaire before and after surgery. The questionnaire included demographic data and scales such as the Body Esteem Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale—SES, the Satisfaction with Life Scale—SWLS, the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience—SPANE. The first hypothesis concerned the subjective assessment of body self-perception after the procedure. The results of the study confirm this hypothesis—female patients after surgery rate their body self-perception higher, which indicates a positive influence of plastic and aesthetic surgery that increased in the subjective assessment of 66 examined patients. Moreover, the study revealed a higher self-assessment after procedures. On the other hand, the results indicated that younger patients had a higher body assessment, but there was no increase in self-assessment. Except for breast augmentation surgery, there was no influence on self-assessment and life satisfaction improvement after other surgical procedures. In patients up to 48 years old, after surgery, there was a significant dependence between subjective body self-assessment and all surveyed forms of welfare. In the case of patients after 48 year of age, there was a relationship between life satisfaction and body self-perception both before and after surgical treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Edyta Skwirczyńska & Michał Piotrowiak & Marek Ostrowski & Oskar Wróblewski & Karol Tejchman & Sebastian Kwiatkowski & Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska, 2022. "Welfare and Self-Assessment in Patients after Aesthetic and Reconstructive Treatments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11238-:d:908966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11238/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11238/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11238-:d:908966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.