IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10753-d900779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Perception of Women with Atopic Dermatitis in Family Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Alcantara-Luna

    (Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avda. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde

    (Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Avda. del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granda, Spain)

  • Javier Domínguez-Cruz

    (Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avda. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Manuel Galán-Gutiérrez

    (Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Francisco Navarro-Triviño

    (Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Avda. del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granda, Spain)

  • Jose-Juan Pereyra-Rodriguez

    (Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avda. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jose-Carlos Armario-Hita

    (Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real, Calle Romería, 7, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly frequent chronic inflammatory skin disease. It is important to know how women with AD approach family planning together with their disease. The aim of the present research is to develop and validate a questionnaire for women diagnosed with AD in order to measure their level of desire and gestational information. Materials and Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted. Women between 18 and 45 years old with mild, moderate, and severe forms of the disease were included and disease-free controls. An exploratory factorial analysis of the primary components and varimax rotation was used to measure the validity of the construct. Cronbach’s α was used to measure the reliability of the individual scales and the global questionnaire. Results: In total, 150 valid questionnaires were included. The final questionnaire consisted of 23 items that converged on six factors. The six scales had adequate reliability: “Pregnancy” (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95), “Conception” (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93), “Concern-information” (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82), “Breastfeeding” (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81), “Sexual life” (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79), and “Family planning” (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.67). The total Cronbach’s alpha of the questionnaire was 0.94. Discussion: This questionnaire is the first specific measurement instrument developed for women with AD of childbearing age that has demonstrated adequate levels of reliability and construct validity. We consider it useful and valuable to study aspects such as family planning in this patient profile, and that can influence their decision to have offspring.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Alcantara-Luna & Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde & Javier Domínguez-Cruz & Manuel Galán-Gutiérrez & Francisco Navarro-Triviño & Jose-Juan Pereyra-Rodriguez & Jose-Carlos Armario-Hita, 2022. "Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Perception of Women with Atopic Dermatitis in Family Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10753-:d:900779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10753/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10753/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Zhang & Xiaoxiao Xu & Yanlong Guo, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Commercial Street Quality Improvement Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method—Taking Hefei Shuanggang Old Street as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10753-:d:900779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.