IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10737-d900486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing User Experience of Eye-Controlled Systems: Design Recommendations on the Optimal Size, Distance and Shape of Interactive Components from the Perspective of Peripheral Vision

Author

Listed:
  • Yafeng Niu

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Jingze Tian

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Zijian Han

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Mengyuan Qu

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Mu Tong

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Wenjun Yang

    (National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aircraft Control, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Chengqi Xue

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

Abstract

For special populations with motor impairments, eye-controlled interaction may be the only way for them to communicate with the outside world. Because of the dominance of vision in the motor mechanism, eye-controlled interaction has high usability and important research value. During eye-controlled interaction, the visual channel needs to receive information from the graphical user interface (GUI) and transmit the user’s eye-controlled instructions, which overburdens the visual channel and reduces the efficiency of eye-controlled interaction. This study presents an ergonomic experiment to study how to design interactive GUI components in an eye-controlled user interface. The experiments were conducted based on the shape, size, and distance (from the object to the center of the screen) of the visual interactive components. The experiment comprised three parts: (1) the pre-experiment determined the evaluation index and selected the icon material; (2) the formal experiment was a three-factor within-subjects experiment, which included a search task using participants’ peripheral vision; and (3) after the experiment, subjective evaluations were conducted using a questionnaire. The results showed that the shape, size, and distance of the interactive object significantly affected the reaction time, and the size factor significantly affected the movement time of the eye-controlled interaction. Finally, combined with the results of the subjective evaluation, we concluded that the recommended sizes of the interactive components were 2.889°, 3.389°, and 3.889°, and the recommended distances were 5.966° and 8.609°. Additionally, designers should utilize components with simple concrete shapes as much as possible to improve user recognition efficiency. Our study provides enlightening recommendations on how to design components in eye-controlled interactive interfaces, and has great guiding significance for building design standards of the eye-controlled systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yafeng Niu & Jingze Tian & Zijian Han & Mengyuan Qu & Mu Tong & Wenjun Yang & Chengqi Xue, 2022. "Enhancing User Experience of Eye-Controlled Systems: Design Recommendations on the Optimal Size, Distance and Shape of Interactive Components from the Perspective of Peripheral Vision," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10737-:d:900486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10737-:d:900486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.