IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10732-d900444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Feedback for Learners in Interprofessional Settings: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Varun Coelho

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada)

  • Andrew Scott

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada)

  • Elif Bilgic

    (Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada)

  • Amy Keuhl

    (Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada)

  • Matthew Sibbald

    (Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada)

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional feedback is becoming increasingly emphasized within health professions’ training programs. The objective of this scoping review is to determine what is known about how learners perceive and interact with feedback in an interprofessional context for learning. Methods: A search strategy was developed and conducted in Ovid MEDLINE. Title and abstract screening were performed by two reviewers independently. Next, full texts of selected articles were reviewed by one reviewer to determine the articles included in the review. Data extraction was performed to determine the articles’ study population, methodologies and outcomes relevant to the research objective. Results: Our analysis of the relevant outcomes yielded four key concepts: (1) issues with the feedback process and the need for training; (2) the perception of feedback providers, affecting how the feedback is utilized; (3) professions of the feedback providers, affecting the feedback process; and (4) learners’ own attitude toward feedback, affecting the feedback process. Conclusions: The learner’s perception of interprofessional feedback can be an obstacle in the feedback process. Training around interprofessional feedback should be included as part of interprofessional programs. Research is needed to explore how to address barriers in feedback interaction that stem from misguided perceptions of feedback providers’ professions.

Suggested Citation

  • Varun Coelho & Andrew Scott & Elif Bilgic & Amy Keuhl & Matthew Sibbald, 2022. "Understanding Feedback for Learners in Interprofessional Settings: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10732-:d:900444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10732/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10732/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10732-:d:900444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.