IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10704-d899662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pollution Levels and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Soil of a Landfill Site: A Case Study in Lhasa, Tibet

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Zhou

    (School of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Dan Zeng

    (School of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Xutong Wang

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Lingyu Tai

    (Key Laboratory of Agro-Forestry Environmental Processes and Ecological Regulation of Hainan Province, College of Ecology & Environment, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Wenwu Zhou

    (School of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China)

  • Qiongda Zhuoma

    (The People’s Government of Bahe Township in Gongbo’gyamda, Nyingchi 860000, China)

  • Fawei Lin

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

As an important ecological security barrier in China, the ecological environment of Tibet has aroused widespread concern domestically and overseas. Landfills are a major solid waste treatment approach in Tibet but also cause severe environmental pollution. To date, there are no studies related to the pollution risk of landfills in Tibetan areas. This study investigated the pollution levels, ecological risk, health risk, and possible pollution sources of eight heavy metals in the soils around a landfill site in Lhasa, Tibet. The results indicated that the concentrations of heavy metals in soil were relatively low, only cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb) were 1–2 times higher than the corresponding background value. The values of the single pollution index and geo-accumulation index show that the study area is most seriously polluted by Cd and As. Based on the Nemerow pollution index and the pollution load index, over 83.3% and 8.33% of soil sampling sites had light and moderate contamination levels. According to the results of potential ecological risk evaluation, the potential ecological risk of heavy metals in soil was very low, and only one out of the 72 sampling sites exhibited considerable ecological risk. Cd, As, and mercury (Hg) served as the dominant ecological risk contributors and contributed over 45.0%, 14.1%, and 18% of the ecological risk. The results of the health risk evaluation showed that adults have a higher risk of cancer (1.73 × 10 −5 ), while the non-carcinogenic risk for adults was low. Waste disposal activities and construction activities have a significant influence on soil heavy metal concentrations, causing a higher pollution level in the southeast part of the landfill site in Lhasa.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Zhou & Dan Zeng & Xutong Wang & Lingyu Tai & Wenwu Zhou & Qiongda Zhuoma & Fawei Lin, 2022. "Pollution Levels and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Soil of a Landfill Site: A Case Study in Lhasa, Tibet," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10704-:d:899662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10704-:d:899662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.