IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p10590-d897172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Advanced Competencies in Physiotherapy: Impact of a Single-Blinded Controlled Trial on Ethics Competence

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Cortés-Amador

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    UBIC Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anna Arnal-Gómez

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    Physiotherapy in Motion, Multispeciality Research Group (PTin MOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Elena Marques-Sule

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    Physiotherapy in Motion, Multispeciality Research Group (PTin MOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • David Hernández-Guillén

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    Group of Physiotherapy in the Aging Process: Social and Health Care Strategies (PT_AGE), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Catalina Tolsada-Velasco

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Gemma V. Espí-López

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
    Exercise Intervention for Health (EXINH), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

Background: Innovation in the training of future physiotherapy professionals through the use of collaborative learning could be an effective method for developing advanced competencies such as professional ethics. This study aimed at comparing the effects of cooperative learning and individual learning on the knowledge of professional ethics, the perception of knowledge regarding professional ethics, the teaching quality assessment and satisfaction in future physiotherapy professionals. Methods: A prospective, assessor-blinded, controlled trial was performed. A 12-week program was carried out with future physiotherapy professionals. The cooperative learning group was based on group activities, while the individual learning group performed the same activities with an individual approach. Knowledge, perception of knowledge regarding professional ethics, teaching quality and satisfaction were assessed. Results: A total of 216 participants completed the study (cooperative group n = 106; individual group n = 110). The cooperative learning group showed higher knowledge and perception of knowledge regarding professional ethics compared to the individual learning group ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, the cooperative learning group reported higher scores in the teaching materials, attitude towards future professionals and the teacher’s global score. Conclusions: Cooperative learning showed a positive impact on developing advanced competencies such as knowledge and perception of knowledge regarding professional ethics. Both methodologies showed adequate results in the assessment of teaching quality and satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Cortés-Amador & Anna Arnal-Gómez & Elena Marques-Sule & David Hernández-Guillén & Catalina Tolsada-Velasco & Gemma V. Espí-López, 2022. "Development of Advanced Competencies in Physiotherapy: Impact of a Single-Blinded Controlled Trial on Ethics Competence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10590-:d:897172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/10590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10590-:d:897172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.