IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p9918-d885824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Body Composition and Values of Selected Nutritional Status Indices Influence the Glycaemic Index Values of Vegetarian Dishes? A Pilot Study in a Group of Older Women

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Raczkowska

    (Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Maciej Bienkiewicz

    (Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Robert Gajda

    (Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Monika Bronkowska

    (Institute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, Katowicka 68, 45-060 Opole, Poland)

  • Ewa Piotrowska

    (Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Marta Habánová

    (Institute of Nutrition and Genomics, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia)

Abstract

An ageing population brings with it the need for public policy to respond to the demands and health needs of this group of people. The ageing process has been shown to be associated with changes in body composition. These mainly concern a decrease in muscle mass and an increase in body fat. Body composition and other indicators of nutritional status are important factors differentiating carbohydrate management. Glycaemic index (GI) values may be affected by differences resulting from individual metabolism. The rate of carbohydrate digestion is also influenced by a number of factors, including the degree to which the product is processed, the structure of the starch, and the presence of protein, fat and dietary fibre. Available studies do not provide information on the glycaemic response following the consumption of specific products by older people with varying BMI and body composition. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the body mass index (BMI) values of women aged 50–80 years on the glycaemic response after eating vegetarian meals and the influence of selected indices of nutritional status on their GI values. It has been shown that the areas under the glycaemic curves after the consumption of the tested foods, both traditional and modified, are higher in the group of overweight and obese women. Nevertheless, the GI of meals consumed by those with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 is lower than that of foods consumed by women with normal values of this index. In the group of women with BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 , on the basis of an analysis of the obtained correlations, it was observed that the GI value of modified products depends on the percentage of body fat (FM%) ( p = 0.0363) and the percentage of fat free mass (FFM%) ( p = 0.0363), and, in the case of traditional products, also on the percentage of total body water (%) ( p = 0.0133). In the group of women with a BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 , significant correlations were only found between the GI of modified foods and the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) ( p = 0.0363) and the ratio of waist circumference to height (WHtR) ( p = 0.0369) indices. The GI values of food set solely with the participation of young, healthy people should not be the basis for the nutrition planning of all groups of people.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Raczkowska & Maciej Bienkiewicz & Robert Gajda & Monika Bronkowska & Ewa Piotrowska & Marta Habánová, 2022. "Do Body Composition and Values of Selected Nutritional Status Indices Influence the Glycaemic Index Values of Vegetarian Dishes? A Pilot Study in a Group of Older Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9918-:d:885824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9918/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9918/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9918-:d:885824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.