IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p9902-d885558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility and Comparative Effectiveness for the Delivery of the National Diabetes Prevention Program through Cooperative Extension in Rural Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Anna M. Gorczyca

    (Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Richard A. Washburn

    (Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Patricia Smith

    (Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Robert N. Montgomery

    (Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Lyndsie M. Koon

    (Research and Training Center on Independent Living, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA)

  • Mary Hastert

    (Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Kameron B. Suire

    (Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

  • Joseph E. Donnelly

    (Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA)

Abstract

The U.S. Cooperative Extension Service (CE) has potential to deliver the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) to rural residents with prediabetes. However, the CE remains underutilized for the delivery of NDPP. We compared the feasibility/effectiveness of the NDPP (0–6 mos.) delivered by CE personnel to rural residents with prediabetes using Zoom ® (CE-Zoom ® ) or by our research staff using Facebook ® (FB). Adults (n = 31, age ~55 years) were enrolled (CE-Zoom ® n = 16, FB n = 15). Attendance did not differ significantly between groups (CE Zoom ® = 69%, FB = 83%, p = 0.15). Participant retention was similar in the CE Zoom ® (88%) and FB groups (87%). CE-Zoom ® and FB ® groups provided weekly, self-monitoring data for 83% and 84% of the 24 potential weeks, respectively. Six-month weight loss was not different between groups (CE-Zoom ® = −5.99 ± 8.0 kg, −5.4%, FB = −1.68 ± 3.3 kg, −1.6% p = 0.13). Participants achieving ≥5% weight loss was greater in the CE-Zoom ® (44%) compared with the FB group (7%, p = 0.04). Participants achieving the NDPP program goal for physical activity (≥150 min/week) did not differ (CE-Zoom ® = 75%, FB = 67%, p = 0.91). This pilot trial demonstrated the potential feasibility and effectiveness of the NDPP delivered by CE personnel in a group remote format (Zoom ® ) to adults with prediabetes living in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna M. Gorczyca & Richard A. Washburn & Patricia Smith & Robert N. Montgomery & Lyndsie M. Koon & Mary Hastert & Kameron B. Suire & Joseph E. Donnelly, 2022. "Feasibility and Comparative Effectiveness for the Delivery of the National Diabetes Prevention Program through Cooperative Extension in Rural Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9902-:d:885558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9902/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9902/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9902-:d:885558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.