IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p9776-d883458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adherence to Carbohydrate Counting Improved Diet Quality of Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus during Social Distancing Due to COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Correia Uliana

    (Postgraduate Program in Neurosciences and Behavior, Nucleus of Behavior Theory Research, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil)

  • Manuela Maria De Lima Carvalhal

    (Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil)

  • Talita Nogueira Berino

    (Postgraduate Program in Neurosciences and Behavior, Nucleus of Behavior Theory Research, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil)

  • Aline Leão Reis

    (Postgraduate Program in Neurosciences and Behavior, Nucleus of Behavior Theory Research, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil)

  • Karem Miléo Felício

    (Postgraduate Program in Attention and Clinical Study in Diabetes, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil)

  • João Soares Felício

    (Postgraduate Program in Attention and Clinical Study in Diabetes, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil)

  • Daniela Lopes Gomes

    (Postgraduate Program in Neurosciences and Behavior, Nucleus of Behavior Theory Research, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil
    Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66075-110, Brazil)

Abstract

To control glycemic variability in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), it is essential to perform carbohydrate counting (CC), a strategy that ensures better quality of life for these patients. Thus, this study aims to analyze potential factors associated with adherence to CC in adults with T1DM during social distancing due to COVID-19 in Brazil. This was a single cross-sectional study carried out in July 2020. An online form was used to collect sociodemographic and economic data on the purchasing of supplies and food, as well as social distancing. The Chi-square test was performed with adjusted residuals analysis and a binomial logistic regression analysis ( p < 0.05). Of 472 adults, 37.71% reported performing CC in the same frequency as before social distancing. There was an association between performance of CC and the type of city ( p = 0.027), family income ( p = 0.000), use of financial emergency aid ( p = 0.045), type of insulin administration and glycemic monitoring ( p < 0.000), and cooking more ( p = 0.012). Participants who maintained or reduced consumption of ultra-processed foods were 0.62 times more likely to adhere to CC (OR 0.626, 95% IC: 0.419–0.935) and participants who cooked more were 1.67 times more likely to adhere to CC (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.146–2.447). There are still people with T1DM who did not know about and did not use CC method, which highlights the need for diabetes education.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Correia Uliana & Manuela Maria De Lima Carvalhal & Talita Nogueira Berino & Aline Leão Reis & Karem Miléo Felício & João Soares Felício & Daniela Lopes Gomes, 2022. "Adherence to Carbohydrate Counting Improved Diet Quality of Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus during Social Distancing Due to COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9776-:d:883458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulo H. C. de Vasconcelos & Daniela L. Gomes & Gabriela C. Uliana & Anselmo de A. Costa e Silva, 2021. "Social Distancing, Physical Activity, and COVID-19: Implications for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9776-:d:883458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.