IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10250-d891143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Obesity on the Waist Circumference Cut-Point Used for the Diagnosis of the Metabolic Syndrome in African Women: Results from the SWEET Study

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe J. Gradidge

    (Centre for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa)

  • Shane A. Norris

    (SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa)

  • Nigel J. Crowther

    (Department of Chemical Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa)

Abstract

Waist circumference (WC) is one of the diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, studies have shown that the waist cut-point may be influenced by BMI. The aim of this study was to, therefore, determine whether the presence of obesity influences the WC cut-point used to diagnose MetS in sub-Saharan African women. The second aim was to determine whether calculated cut-points of other waist-related and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-determined anthropometric measures used for the diagnosis of MetS were also influenced by BMI. Biochemical, simple anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived anthropometric data were collected in 702 black South African women from the Study of Women Entering and in Endocrine Transition (SWEET). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine waist, waist-to-hip (WHR) and waist-to-height ratios, body shape index (ABSI), total body fat, trunk fat, and peripheral (arm + leg) fat cut-points for MetS (without waist) in subjects with BMI above or below the median value. The estimated WC cut-points (107 cm, 93.5 cm) for women with high BMI and low BMI, respectively, and the cut-points for the other anthropometric variables for the diagnosis of MetS were greater in high BMI women compared to low BMI women. The exceptions were WHR and ABSI, for which the cut-points were very similar in both BMI groups, and peripheral fat, where the cut-point was lower in the high BMI group. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that WC was associated with a higher risk (odds ratio [95% CIs]: 1.07 [1.04, 1.10]; p < 0.0001), whilst hip was associated with a lower risk (0.97 [0.94, 0.99]; p = 0.02) for MetS. These data suggest that with increasing BMI, the higher levels of protective gluteofemoral fat lead to the requirement for higher WC cut-points for MetS diagnosis. The opposing associations of waist and hip with MetS risk make WHR a more appropriate variable for diagnosing MetS among African women as the WHR cut-point is less influenced by increasing BMI than is WC, which was also observed for ABSI.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe J. Gradidge & Shane A. Norris & Nigel J. Crowther, 2022. "The Effect of Obesity on the Waist Circumference Cut-Point Used for the Diagnosis of the Metabolic Syndrome in African Women: Results from the SWEET Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10250-:d:891143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10250-:d:891143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.