IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9652-d881090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Channeled PM 10 , PM 2.5 and PM 1 Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Celades

    (Institute of Ceramic Technology (ITC-AICE), University Jaume I, Campus Universitario Riu Sec, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12006 Castellón, Spain)

  • Vicenta Sanfelix

    (Institute of Ceramic Technology (ITC-AICE), University Jaume I, Campus Universitario Riu Sec, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12006 Castellón, Spain)

  • Ana López-Lilao

    (Institute of Ceramic Technology (ITC-AICE), University Jaume I, Campus Universitario Riu Sec, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12006 Castellón, Spain)

  • Salvador Gomar

    (Institute of Ceramic Technology (ITC-AICE), University Jaume I, Campus Universitario Riu Sec, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12006 Castellón, Spain)

  • Alberto Escrig

    (Institute of Ceramic Technology (ITC-AICE), University Jaume I, Campus Universitario Riu Sec, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12006 Castellón, Spain)

  • Eliseo Monfort

    (Institute of Ceramic Technology (ITC-AICE), University Jaume I, Campus Universitario Riu Sec, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12006 Castellón, Spain)

  • Xavier Querol

    (Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), C/Jordi Girona 18, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

A sampling methodology and a mathematical data treatment were developed that enable to determine not only total suspended particulates (TSP) emitted at channeled sources but also the PM 10 , PM 2.5 , and PM 1 mass fractions (w 10 , w 2.5 , and w 1 ) and emission factors (E.F.), using a seven-stage cascade impactor. Moreover, a chemical analysis was performed to identify the elements present in these emissions. The proposed methodology was applied to different stages of the ceramic process, including ambient temperature (milling, shaping, glazing) and medium–high-temperature (spray-drying, drying, firing, and frit melting) stages. In total, more than 100 measurements were performed (pilot scale and industrial scale), which leads to a measurement time of 1500 h. Related to the mass fractions, in general, the mean values of w 10 after the fabric filters operated at high performance are high and with little dispersion (75–85%), and it is also observed that they are practically independent of the stage considered, i.e., they are not significantly dependent on the initial PSD of the stream to be treated. In the case of the fine fraction w 2.5 , the behavior is more complex (w 2.5 : 30–60%), probably because the only variable is not the cleaning system, but also the nature of the processed material. Regarding abatement measures, the use of high-efficiency cleaning systems considerably reduces the emission factors obtained for fractions PM 10 , PM 2.5 , and PM 1 . In reference to chemical analysis, the presence of ZrO 2 and Ni in the spray-drying and pressing stages, the significant concentration of ZrO 2 in the glazing stage, the presence of Pb, As, and Zn in the firing stage, and the presence of Zn, Pb, Cd, and As compounds in the frits manufacturing should all be highlighted. Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the use of some compounds, such as cadmium and lead, has been very limited in the last years and, therefore, presumably, the presence of these elements in the emissions should have been also reduced in the same way.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Celades & Vicenta Sanfelix & Ana López-Lilao & Salvador Gomar & Alberto Escrig & Eliseo Monfort & Xavier Querol, 2022. "Channeled PM 10 , PM 2.5 and PM 1 Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9652-:d:881090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9652/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9652/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aristide Giuliano & Massimiliano Errico & Hamid Salehi & Pasquale Avino, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment by Green Processes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-4, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9652-:d:881090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.