IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9496-d878627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Therapists’ Emotional Responses in Individual Therapy with Depressed Adolescents: An Evaluation of the Data Structure of the Feeling-Word Checklist—28

Author

Listed:
  • Pernille Brøsholen

    (Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1039, Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway)

  • Randi Ulberg

    (Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1039, Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway
    Research Unit, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestfold Hospital Trust, P.O. Box 2169, 3125 Tønsberg, Norway
    Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, P.O. Box 85, Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway)

  • Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl

    (Research Unit, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestfold Hospital Trust, P.O. Box 2169, 3125 Tønsberg, Norway
    Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, P.O. Box 85, Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway
    Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1094, Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway)

  • Agneta Thorén

    (The Erica Foundation, Odengatan 9, P.O. Box 114 24, 911424 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

Countertransference (CT) responses during therapy sessions can be understood as the therapist’s emotional reactions towards the patient. Within adolescents’ psychotherapy, little is known about the effects of the therapists’ feelings on treatment outcome. The Feeling-Word Checklist—28 (FWC-28) is a self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the therapist’s in-session feelings during therapy with younger patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the clinician-rated FWC-28 and explore the associations between the CT-subscales and therapeutic alliance. Data were collected from a randomized controlled trial in which 11 therapists specialized in child and adolescent psychotherapy treated 16- to 18-year-old patients ( n = 62) with major depressive disorder in outpatient clinics. The patients received psychodynamic psychotherapy treatment over 28 sessions. Therapists rated their emotional responses towards their patients on FWC-28 after sessions 3, 12, 20, and 28. Principal component analysis (PCA) with oblique rotation was performed to find clinically meaningful subscales of the FWC-28. PCA revealed four clinically meaningful components termed as follows: inadequate, confident, motherly, and disengaged. The psychometric properties of the FWC and the reliability of the CT subscales measured with Cronbach’s alpha were acceptable. The therapist-reported alliance showed significant and clinically meaningful correlations with all CT-subscales. Our findings indicate that the checklist is adequate for clinical practice and countertransference research in adolescents’ psychotherapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Pernille Brøsholen & Randi Ulberg & Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl & Agneta Thorén, 2022. "Therapists’ Emotional Responses in Individual Therapy with Depressed Adolescents: An Evaluation of the Data Structure of the Feeling-Word Checklist—28," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9496-:d:878627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9496/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9496/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alberto Stefana & Paolo Fusar-Poli & Cristina Gnisci & Eduard Vieta & Eric A. Youngstrom, 2022. "Clinicians’ Emotional Reactions toward Patients with Depressive Symptoms in Mood Disorders: A Narrative Scoping Review of Empirical Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-23, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9496-:d:878627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.