IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9451-d878088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version

Author

Listed:
  • Rebeca Robles

    (Global Mental Health Research Center, Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City 14370, Mexico)

  • Ana Fresán

    (Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Subdirectorate of Clinical Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City 14370, Mexico)

  • Natasha Alcocer-Castillejos

    (Neurology and Psychiatry Department, Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Mexico City 14080, Mexico)

  • Janet Real-Ramírez

    (School of Public Health of Mexico, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico City 62100, Mexico)

  • Silvia Morales-Chainé

    (Psychology Faculty, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

Abstract

Background: The Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) is a brief, valid, reliable self-assessment instrument to identify health professionals’ distress and those in need of an intervention. Objective: to evaluate the construct, predictive validity (of depression, suicidal ideation, insomnia, and generalized anxiety), and internal consistency of the 7-item Spanish version of the PWBI (PWBI-S). Methods: out of a national population of approximately 1 million Mexican healthcare professionals, a sample of 3506 subjects (42.0% physicians, 28.7% nurses and 29.3% psychologists) completed an online survey between 17 April and 7 May 2020, at the time of the COVID-19 case cluster transmission scenario in Mexico. Results: In the three sub-samples, PWBI-S’s Confirmatory factor analyses (adding residual covariances) exhibited adequate goodness of fit indices for the PWBS original unidimensional model. Overall Cronbach’s alphas were 0.89 for physicians, 0.90 for nurses, and 0.86 for psychologists. Univariate logistic regression models showed that a cutoff point of 3 on the total score of the PWBI-S was generally related to the presence of depression, suicidal ideation, and insomnia, but not with generalized anxiety among nurses and psychologists. When trying with a cutoff point of 3, a relationship with GA was shown in psychologists, but not in nurses. Conclusions: our findings suggest that PWBI-S is a valid, reliable measure for clinical and research purposes in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebeca Robles & Ana Fresán & Natasha Alcocer-Castillejos & Janet Real-Ramírez & Silvia Morales-Chainé, 2022. "Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9451-:d:878088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9451/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9451/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9451-:d:878088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.