IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9425-d877632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quadrivalent Vaccines for the Immunization of Adults against Influenza: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Mannocci

    (Faculty of Economics, Universitas Mercatorum, 00186 Rome, Italy)

  • Andrea Pellacchia

    (Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy)

  • Rossella Millevolte

    (Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy)

  • Manuela Chiavarini

    (Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy)

  • Chiara de Waure

    (Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy)

Abstract

Vaccination is the most effective intervention to prevent influenza. Adults at risk of complications are among the targets of the vaccination campaigns and can be vaccinated with different types of quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs). In the light of assessing the relative immunogenicity and efficacy of different QIVs, a systematic review was performed. Randomized controlled trials conducted in adults aged 18–64 years until 30 March 2021 were searched through three databases (Medline, Cochrane Library and Scopus). Twenty-four RCTs were eventually included. After data extraction, a network meta-analysis was not applicable due to the lack of common comparators. However, in the presence of at least two studies, single meta-analyses were performed to evaluate immunogenicity and efficacy; on the contrary, data from single studies were considered. Seroconversion rate for H1N1 was higher for standard QIVs, while for the remaining strains it was higher for low-dose adjuvanted QIVs. For seroprotection rate, the recombinant vaccine recorded the highest values for H3N2, while for the other strains, the cell-based QIVs achieved better results. In general, standard and cell-based QIVs showed an overall good immunogenicity profile. Nevertheless, as a relative comparative analysis was not possible, further research would be deserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Mannocci & Andrea Pellacchia & Rossella Millevolte & Manuela Chiavarini & Chiara de Waure, 2022. "Quadrivalent Vaccines for the Immunization of Adults against Influenza: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9425-:d:877632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9425-:d:877632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.