IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9245-d874331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lufuno Muleba

    (National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
    Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa)

  • Renay Van Wyk

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa)

  • Jennifer Pienaar

    (Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK)

  • Edith Ratshikhopha

    (National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa)

  • Tanusha Singh

    (National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
    Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa
    Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa)

Abstract

Hand sanitizers are used as an alternative to hand washing to reduce the number of viable microorganisms when soap and water are not readily available. This study aimed to investigate the anti-bacterial effectiveness of commercially available hand sanitizers and those commonly used in healthcare and community settings. A mapping exercise was done to select and procure different hand sanitizers ( n = 18) from retailers. Five microorganisms implicated in hospital-acquired infections were selected and tested against each hand sanitizer: Escherichia coli , Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Staphylococcus aureus . Twenty-one volunteers were recruited to do a handprint before and after applying the hand sanitizer. Only four out of eighteen hand sanitizers (22%) were effective against all tested bacterial species, and an equal number (22%) were completely ineffective. Seven hand sanitizers with a label claim of 99.99% were only effective against E. coli . Only five hand sanitizers (27%) effectively reduced bacteria on participants’ hands. This study showed that only a fifth of hand sanitizers were effective against selected microorganisms. The findings raise a concern about the effectiveness of hand sanitizers and their role in infection, prevention, and control if not well regulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Lufuno Muleba & Renay Van Wyk & Jennifer Pienaar & Edith Ratshikhopha & Tanusha Singh, 2022. "Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9245-:d:874331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9245-:d:874331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.