IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9084-d871801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endoscopic Endonasal Repair of Congenital Choanal Atresia: Predictive Factors of Surgical Stability and Healing Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Salvatore Ferlito

    (Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, E.N.T. Section, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy)

  • Antonino Maniaci

    (Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, E.N.T. Section, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
    Rhinology Study Group of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), 75009 Paris, France)

  • Alberto Giulio Dragonetti

    (Otolaryngology Unit, 9338 Ospedale Niguarda “Ca’ Granda”, 20162 Milano, Italy)

  • Salvatore Cocuzza

    (Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, E.N.T. Section, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy)

  • Jerome Rene Lechien

    (Rhinology Study Group of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), 75009 Paris, France
    Service of Otolaryngology, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, 91190 Paris, France)

  • Christian Calvo-Henríquez

    (Rhinology Study Group of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), 75009 Paris, France
    Service of Otolaryngology, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, 15701 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Juan Maza-Solano

    (Rhinology Study Group of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), 75009 Paris, France
    Rhinology and Skull Base Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Virgen de la Macarena, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • Luca Giovanni Locatello

    (Rhinology Study Group of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), 75009 Paris, France
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sant’Antonio Abate Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, 33100 Tolmezzo, Italy)

  • Sebastiano Caruso

    (Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, E.N.T. Section, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy)

  • Francesco Nocera

    (Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, E.N.T. Section, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy)

  • Andrea Achena

    (Otolaryngology Unit, 9338 Ospedale Niguarda “Ca’ Granda”, 20162 Milano, Italy)

  • Niccolò Mevio

    (Rhinology Study Group of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), 75009 Paris, France)

  • Gabriella Mantini

    (Otolaryngology Unit, 9338 Ospedale Niguarda “Ca’ Granda”, 20162 Milano, Italy)

  • Giorgio Ormellese

    (Otolaryngology Unit, 9338 Ospedale Niguarda “Ca’ Granda”, 20162 Milano, Italy)

  • Angelo Placentino

    (Otolaryngology Unit, 9338 Ospedale Niguarda “Ca’ Granda”, 20162 Milano, Italy)

  • Ignazio La Mantia

    (Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, E.N.T. Section, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy)

Abstract

Background: To assess the long-term outcomes and independent predictors of surgical success of a one-stage minimally invasive surgical procedure for congenital choanal atresia (C.C.A.). Methods: a retrospective multicentric study was conducted between 2010 and 2022. An endonasal endoscopic approach was performed in 38 unilateral or bilateral C.C.A. children. All the patients were clinically and radiologically assessed and followed for at least 2 years. Seven outcome measures were applied. Consequently, surgical success was correlated with all the independent variables reported. Results: 18/38 (47.36%) patients presented normal postoperative healing, 8/38 (21.05) had moderate restenosis (<50%), while 12/38 (31.57%) cases were severe (>50%), requiring a surgical revision. No statistical significance was found for average hospital stay between stenosis >50% and <50% patients ( p = 0.802) and postoperative pain ( p = 0.075); instead, the severe restenosis group demonstrated a higher delay of breast suction ( p < 0.001). Among the independent variables predictors of surgical success, the presence of Charge syndrome and rhinopharyngeal stenosis demonstrated higher risks for surgical revision (OR: 4.00, 95% CI: 0.57–28.01, and OR: 2.75, 95% CI: 0.55–13.69, respectively). On the contrary, the hypoplastic inferior turbinate and bilateral C.C.A. showed a lower risk for severe restenosis by a higher endoscopic surgical space and creating a single larger opening (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.22–3.52, and OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.10–2.08). Conclusion: Several independent variables could influence the surgical success after C.C.A. endoscopic repair; however, more high-quality evidence is needed to generate an effective predictive model.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvatore Ferlito & Antonino Maniaci & Alberto Giulio Dragonetti & Salvatore Cocuzza & Jerome Rene Lechien & Christian Calvo-Henríquez & Juan Maza-Solano & Luca Giovanni Locatello & Sebastiano Caruso , 2022. "Endoscopic Endonasal Repair of Congenital Choanal Atresia: Predictive Factors of Surgical Stability and Healing Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9084-:d:871801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9084/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9084/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9084-:d:871801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.