IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9057-d871387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea D’Aviero

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alessia Re

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Francesco Catucci

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy)

  • Danila Piccari

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy
    UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy)

  • Claudio Votta

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy
    UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy)

  • Domenico Piro

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy
    UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy)

  • Antonio Piras

    (UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, 90011 Bagheria, Italy)

  • Carmela Di Dio

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy)

  • Martina Iezzi

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy)

  • Francesco Preziosi

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy)

  • Sebastiano Menna

    (Medical Physics, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Sassari, Italy)

  • Flaviovincenzo Quaranta

    (Medical Physics, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Sassari, Italy)

  • Althea Boschetti

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy)

  • Marco Marras

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy)

  • Francesco Miccichè

    (UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy)

  • Roberto Gallus

    (Otolaryngology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Sassari, Italy)

  • Luca Indovina

    (UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy)

  • Francesco Bussu

    (Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
    Dipartimento delle Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Sperimentali, Università di Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Valentini

    (UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
    Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy)

  • Davide Cusumano

    (Medical Physics, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Sassari, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Gian Carlo Mattiucci

    (Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Italy
    Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Background: Organs at risk (OARs) delineation is a crucial step of radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning workflow. Time-consuming and inter-observer variability are main issues in manual OAR delineation, mainly in the head and neck (H & N) district. Deep-learning based auto-segmentation is a promising strategy to improve OARs contouring in radiotherapy departments. A comparison of deep-learning-generated auto-contours (AC) with manual contours (MC) was performed by three expert radiation oncologists from a single center. Methods: Planning computed tomography (CT) scans of patients undergoing RT treatments for H&N cancers were considered. CT scans were processed by Limbus Contour auto-segmentation software, a commercial deep-learning auto-segmentation based software to generate AC. H&N protocol was used to perform AC, with the structure set consisting of bilateral brachial plexus, brain, brainstem, bilateral cochlea, pharyngeal constrictors, eye globes, bilateral lens, mandible, optic chiasm, bilateral optic nerves, oral cavity, bilateral parotids, spinal cord, bilateral submandibular glands, lips and thyroid. Manual revision of OARs was performed according to international consensus guidelines. The AC and MC were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance transform (DT). Results: A total of 274 contours obtained by processing CT scans were included in the analysis. The highest values of DSC were obtained for the brain (DSC 1.00), left and right eye globes and the mandible (DSC 0.98). The structures with greater MC editing were optic chiasm, optic nerves and cochleae. Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis, deep-learning auto-segmentation seems to provide acceptable H&N OAR delineations. For less accurate organs, AC could be considered a starting point for review and manual adjustment. Our results suggest that AC could become a useful time-saving tool to optimize workload and resources in RT departments.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea D’Aviero & Alessia Re & Francesco Catucci & Danila Piccari & Claudio Votta & Domenico Piro & Antonio Piras & Carmela Di Dio & Martina Iezzi & Francesco Preziosi & Sebastiano Menna & Flaviovince, 2022. "Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9057-:d:871387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9057/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9057-:d:871387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.