IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8879-d868551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Older Patients Transferred from Long-Term-Care Hospitals (LTCHs) to Emergency Departments by a Comparison with Non-LTCHs in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Author

Listed:
  • Soon Young Yun

    (National Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, 245, Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04564, Korea
    Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Anyangcheonro 1071, YangChoengu, Seoul 07985, Korea)

  • Ji Yeon Lim

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Anyangcheonro 1071, YangChoengu, Seoul 07985, Korea)

  • Eun Kim

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Anyangcheonro 1071, YangChoengu, Seoul 07985, Korea)

  • Jongseok Oh

    (Department of Economics, Seoul National University, Room 208, Bld 16, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Duk Hee Lee

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Anyangcheonro 1071, YangChoengu, Seoul 07985, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The South Korean population is rapidly aging, and the number of older patients in long-term-care hospitals (LTCHs) continues to increase. This study aims to investigate the epidemiologic data, characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients aged 65 years and older transferred from LTCHs to emergency departments (EDs). This is a retrospective study based on National Emergency Department Information System data from 2014 to 2019. Of the 6,209,695 older patients visiting EDs for disease treatment, 211,141 (3.4%) were transferred from LTCHs. Among patients from LTCHs (211,141), 24.2% were discharged from EDs, 43.0% were admitted to general wards, 20.7% were hospitalized in intensive care units, 3.1% were transferred to another hospital, 6.1% returned to LTCHs, and 2.1% died in EDs. ED stays were the longest for those returning to LTCHs (710.49 ± 1127.43 min). Foley catheterization (40.3%) was most frequently performed in preventable ED visits. In South Korea, older patients being discharged from the ED or returning to LTCHs, after being transferred from LTCHs to EDs, increased. ED stays among older LTCH patients were longer than among non-LTCH older patients, contributing to congestion. To reduce avoidable transfer to EDs from LTCHs, it is necessary to discuss policies, such as expanding appropriate medical personnel and transitional treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Soon Young Yun & Ji Yeon Lim & Eun Kim & Jongseok Oh & Duk Hee Lee, 2022. "Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Older Patients Transferred from Long-Term-Care Hospitals (LTCHs) to Emergency Departments by a Comparison with Non-LTCHs in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8879-:d:868551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8879/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8879/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8879-:d:868551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.