IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8820-d867178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto De Stefani

    (Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35100 Padova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Martina Barone

    (Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35100 Padova, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sam Hatami Alamdari

    (Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35100 Padova, Italy)

  • Arjola Barjami

    (Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35100 Padova, Italy)

  • Ugo Baciliero

    (Maxillofacial Surgery Complex Unit of San Bortolo Hospital of Vicenza, 36100 Vicenza, Italy)

  • Federico Apolloni

    (Maxillofacial Surgery Complex Unit of San Bortolo Hospital of Vicenza, 36100 Vicenza, Italy)

  • Antonio Gracco

    (Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35100 Padova, Italy
    These authors share the last authorship.)

  • Giovanni Bruno

    (Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, University of Padova, 35100 Padova, Italy
    These authors share the last authorship.)

Abstract

Aim: Three-dimensional facial imaging systems are a useful tool that is gradually replacing two-dimensional imaging and traditional anthropometry with calipers. In this varied and growing landscape of new devices, Canfield (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ, USA) has proposed a series of static and portable 3D imaging systems. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature regarding the validation of Canfield’s Vectra imaging systems. Materials and Methods: A search strategy was developed on electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus by using specific keywords. After the study selection phase, a total of 10 articles were included in the present review. Results: A total of 10 articles were finally included in the present review. For six articles, we conducted a validation of the Vectra static devices, focusing especially on the Vectra M5, Vectra M3 and Vectra XT. For four articles, we validated the Vectra H1 portable system. Conclusions: All of the reviewed articles concluded that Canfield’s Vectra 3D imaging systems are capable of capturing accurate and reproducible stereophotogrammetric images. Minor errors were reported, particularly in the acquisition of the perioral region, but all the evaluated devices are considered to be valid and accurate tools for clinicians.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto De Stefani & Martina Barone & Sam Hatami Alamdari & Arjola Barjami & Ugo Baciliero & Federico Apolloni & Antonio Gracco & Giovanni Bruno, 2022. "Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8820-:d:867178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8820-:d:867178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.