IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8705-d864834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge, Practices and Attitudes towards Silver Diamine Fluoride Therapy among Dentists in Japan: A Mixed Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hollis Haotian Chai

    (Department of Stomatology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
    Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Sakura Kiuchi

    (Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan)

  • Ken Osaka

    (Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan)

  • Jun Aida

    (Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
    Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan)

  • Chun-Hung Chu

    (Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Shiqian (Sherry) Gao

    (Department of Stomatology, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
    Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

In 2021, the World Health Organization included silver diamine fluoride (SDF) as an essential medicine to manage caries in adults and children. SDF was developed in the 1960s, but its use for children became unpopular in Japan because of the decline and low prevalence of early childhood caries. This mixed methods study explored the knowledge, practices and attitudes towards SDF therapy among dentists promoting fluoride use in Japan. It also investigated senior dentists’ perceptions of SDF therapy in Japan. The quantitative study invited all 173 members of the largest organisation promoting fluoride use in Japan to complete a web-based questionnaire survey. Sixty (60/173; 35%) dentists promoting fluoride use in Japan completed the questionnaire survey. All dentists knew of SDF treatment, and 50 (50/60; 83%) used SDF for dental care. Fifty-nine dentists (59/60; 98%) agreed that SDF therapy was simple and quick. All 60 dentists agreed that SDF was effective to arrest caries; 51 dentists (51/60; 85%) agreed that SDF was effective to prevent caries. Most dentists (51/60; 85%) were concerned about SDF’s unaesthetic staining. Fifty-seven dentists (57/60; 95%) used SDF to arrest primary posterior teeth, and 52 dentists (52/60; 87%) used SDF to arrest root caries. However, 25 dentists (25/60; 42%) did not use SDF to prevent caries in permanent teeth. The qualitative study interviewed 12 senior dentists using snowball sampling and achieved data saturation. The dentists opined that SDF therapy was effective, simple, painless, non-invasive and inexpensive. SDF is seldom used in Japan at present because of the unaesthetic black staining and the low prevalence of early childhood caries; however, it can regain popularity by arresting root caries in the aging population.

Suggested Citation

  • Hollis Haotian Chai & Sakura Kiuchi & Ken Osaka & Jun Aida & Chun-Hung Chu & Shiqian (Sherry) Gao, 2022. "Knowledge, Practices and Attitudes towards Silver Diamine Fluoride Therapy among Dentists in Japan: A Mixed Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8705-:d:864834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8705/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8705/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8705-:d:864834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.