IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8495-d860754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strength Asymmetries Are Muscle-Specific and Metric-Dependent

Author

Listed:
  • Gennaro Boccia

    (Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
    NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Science, SUISM, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Samuel D'Emanuele

    (Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy)

  • Paolo Riccardo Brustio

    (Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
    NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Science, SUISM, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
    Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy)

  • Luca Beratto

    (NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Science, SUISM, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Cantor Tarperi

    (Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
    Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy)

  • Roberto Casale

    (Opusmedica Persons Care & Research, NPO, 29121 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Tommaso Sciarra

    (Joint Veterans Defence Center, Scientific Department, Army Medical Center, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Alberto Rainoldi

    (NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, School of Exercise and Sport Science, SUISM, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
    Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy)

Abstract

We investigated if dominance affected upper limbs muscle function, and we calculated the level of agreement in asymmetry direction across various muscle-function metrics of two heterologous muscle groups. We recorded elbow flexors and extensors isometric strength of the dominant and non-dominant limb of 55 healthy adults. Participants performed a series of explosive contractions of maximal and submaximal amplitudes to record three metrics of muscle performance: maximal voluntary force (MVF), rate of force development (RFDpeak), and RFD-Scaling Factor (RFD-SF). At the population level, the MVF was the only muscle function that showed a difference between the dominant and non-dominant sides, being on average slightly (3–6%) higher on the non-dominant side. At the individual level, the direction agreement among heterologous muscles was poor for all metrics (Kappa values ≤ 0.15). When considering the homologous muscles, the direction agreement was moderate between MVF and RFDpeak (Kappa = 0.37) and low between MVF and RFD-SF (Kappa = 0.01). The asymmetries are muscle-specific and rarely favour the same side across different muscle-performance metrics. At the individual level, no one side is more performative than the other: each limb is favoured depending on muscle group and performance metric. The present findings can be used by practitioners that want to decrease the asymmetry levels as they should prescribe specific exercise training for each muscle.

Suggested Citation

  • Gennaro Boccia & Samuel D'Emanuele & Paolo Riccardo Brustio & Luca Beratto & Cantor Tarperi & Roberto Casale & Tommaso Sciarra & Alberto Rainoldi, 2022. "Strength Asymmetries Are Muscle-Specific and Metric-Dependent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8495-:d:860754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8495-:d:860754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.