IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8407-d859269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Factors Associated with Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge, Attitudes, and Implementation among Nurses in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Naji Alqahtani

    (Nursing Administration and Education Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, P.O. Box 642, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Kyeung M. Oh

    (School of Nursing, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA)

  • Panagiota Kitsantas

    (Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA)

  • Margaret Rodan

    (School of Nursing, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA)

  • Adnan Innab

    (Nursing Administration and Education Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, P.O. Box 642, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saeed Asiri

    (Medical Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, P.O. Box 642, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ali Kerari

    (Medical Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, P.O. Box 642, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fayez Bin Hayyan

    (Maternal and Child Health Nursing Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, P.O. Box 642, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammad Alharbi

    (Nursing Administration and Education Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, P.O. Box 642, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ghareeb Bahari

    (Nursing Administration and Education Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, P.O. Box 642, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is crucial in keeping nurses aware of the current knowledge and improving clinical decision-making. The integration of nurses’ EBP competencies and organizational support has been suggested to create an effective arena in implementing EBP. The purpose of the study was to examine organizational factors influencing nurses’ EBP knowledge, attitudes, and implementation and identify staff nurses’ perceptions of EBP nursing leadership and hospital supports in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from a convenience sample of staff nurses (N = 227) working in four hospitals using a cross-sectional, correlational descriptive design. Level of education ( p < 0.05), EBP training ( p < 0.05), unit type (ICU ( p < 0.001) and ER ( p < 0.01)), perceived nursing leadership ( p < 0.001), and work environment ( p < 0.05) supports were found significantly associated with nurses’ knowledge. Magnet recognition ( p < 0.01) and knowledge ( p < 0.001) had significant influence on nurses’ attitudes. Unit type (ER) ( p < 0.05), knowledge ( p < 0.001), and attitudes ( p < 0.001) were associated with implementation. Encouragement to attend EBP trainings from nursing leadership was perceived by most nurses (51.1%). Nurses reported their hospitals support EBP through training (68.2%). Findings support the need for healthcare systems to create a culture that facilitates EBP implementation to enhance nurses’ EBP competencies and improve patients’ outcomes. Nursing managers may consider preparing nurses through education.

Suggested Citation

  • Naji Alqahtani & Kyeung M. Oh & Panagiota Kitsantas & Margaret Rodan & Adnan Innab & Saeed Asiri & Ali Kerari & Fayez Bin Hayyan & Mohammad Alharbi & Ghareeb Bahari, 2022. "Organizational Factors Associated with Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge, Attitudes, and Implementation among Nurses in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8407-:d:859269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8407/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8407/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8407-:d:859269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.