IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8377-d858690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Chinese Public’s Perception of Omicron Variants on Social Media: LDA-Based Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Han Wang

    (School of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.)

  • Kun Sun

    (School of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.)

  • Yuwei Wang

    (School of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 is still raging. Similar to other RNA viruses, SARS-COV-2 is constantly mutating, which leads to the production of many infectious and lethal strains. For instance, the omicron variant detected in November 2021 became the leading strain of infection in many countries around the world and sparked an intense public debate on social media. The aim of this study is to explore the Chinese public’s perception of the omicron variants on social media. A total of 121,632 points of data relating to omicron on Sina Weibo from 0:00 27 November 2021 to 23:59:59 30 March 2022 (Beijing time) were collected and analyzed with LDA-based topic modeling and DLUT-Emotion ontology-based sentiment analysis. The results indicate that (1) the public discussion of omicron is based on five topics, including omicron’s impact on the economy, the omicron infection situation in other countries/regions, the omicron infection situation in China, omicron and vaccines and pandemic prevention and control for omicron. (2) From the 3 sentiment orientations of 121,632 valid Weibo posts, 49,402 posts were judged as positive emotions, accounting for approximately 40.6%; 47,667 were negative emotions, accounting for nearly 39.2%; and 24,563 were neutral emotions, accounting for about 20.2%. (3) The result of the analysis of the temporal trend of the seven categories of emotion attribution showed that fear kept decreasing, whereas good kept increasing. This study provides more insights into public perceptions of and attitudes toward emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. The results of this study may provide further recommendations for the Chinese government, public health authorities, and the media to promote knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 variant pandemic-resistant messages.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Wang & Kun Sun & Yuwei Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Chinese Public’s Perception of Omicron Variants on Social Media: LDA-Based Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8377-:d:858690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen Deng & Yi Yang, 2021. "Cross-Platform Comparative Study of Public Concern on Social Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study Based on Twitter and Weibo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Gao & Qingting Zhao & Chuanlin Ning & Difan Guo & Jing Wu & Lina Li, 2021. "Does the COVID-19 Vaccine Still Work That “Most of the Confirmed Cases Had Been Vaccinated”? A Content Analysis of Vaccine Effectiveness Discussion on Sina Weibo during the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Nan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Peng Cui & Ping Zou & Xuan Ju & Yi Liu & Yalu Su, 2022. "Research Progress and Improvement Ideas of Anti-Epidemic Resilience in China’s Urban Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8377-:d:858690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.