IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8334-d858075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Self-Confidence and Willingness to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation among Working Adults—A Quasi-Experimental Study in a Training Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Filip Jaskiewicz

    (Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine Department, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland)

  • Dawid Kowalewski

    (Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine Department, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland)

  • Ewa Kaniecka

    (Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine Department, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland)

  • Remigiusz Kozlowski

    (Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine Department, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland)

  • Michal Marczak

    (Department of Management and Logistic in Healthcare, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland)

  • Dariusz Timler

    (Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine Department, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

Background: There is a potential relationship between the self-confidence and the willingness of bystanders to undertake resuscitation (CPR) and its training. The current guidelines increasingly focus on both the importance of the human factor and the fact that training programs should increase the willingness of bystanders to undertake resuscitation, which may have a direct impact on improving survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Aim: The objective of the study was to analyze factors influencing the assessment of own skills crucial in basic life support (BLS) and the willingness to provide CPR to individual victims. Methods: A pre-test and post-test quasi-experimental design was used in this study. The data was collected from 4 December 2019 to 3 October 2020 in workplaces, during instructor-led BLS courses. Each intervention (training) consisted of a theoretical and a practical part. The program was focused both on the skills and the human factor. Results: Comparison of pre-test and post-test data concerning self-confidence scores of the ability to recognize OHCA among 967 participants demonstrated a significant difference (respectively, Me = 2.2, IQR [2–3] vs. Me = 3.4, IQR [3–4]; p = 0.000). Additionally, self-assessment scores for the ability to perform proper chest compressions between pre-test and post-test also differed significantly (respectively Me = 2.3, IQR [2–3] vs. Me = 3.3, IQR [3–4]; p = 0.000). A highly significant difference was found in the likelihood of changing the decision in favor of the willingness to undertake CPR for all types of victims, with the greatest difference found in relation to the willingness to conduct resuscitation on strangers (OR = 7.67, 95% CI 5.01–11.73; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Completing hands-on training has a highly significant, beneficial effect on the readiness to undertake resuscitation for all types of victims, strangers in particular. Training programs should place particular emphasis on developing readiness to undertake resuscitation for both those who have never been trained and those who had their last training more than one year ago.

Suggested Citation

  • Filip Jaskiewicz & Dawid Kowalewski & Ewa Kaniecka & Remigiusz Kozlowski & Michal Marczak & Dariusz Timler, 2022. "Factors Influencing Self-Confidence and Willingness to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation among Working Adults—A Quasi-Experimental Study in a Training Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8334-:d:858075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8334/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8334/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8334-:d:858075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.