IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8285-d857399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Croatian National Cancer Patient Experience Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Karabatić

    (Department for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
    Croatian Association of Patients with Lung Cancer and Other Respiratory Disease Jedra, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Andreja Šajnić

    (Department for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Sanja Pleština

    (Department for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
    School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Marko Jakopović

    (Department for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
    School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Biljana Kurtović

    (Department of Nursing, University of Applied Health Sciences, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Background: Cancer patients’ experiences of the healthcare system, care, and treatment are increasingly viewed as important in order to inform and improve quality of care, patient safety, and treatment efficacy. Understanding patient experience is a key step in moving toward patient-centred care. The aims of this study were to determine the experience of cancer patients in Central and Eastern European countries and to identify the needs and perspectives of oncological patients during the cancer treatment. In this paper, results from Croatia are presented. Methods: A sixty-nine item online survey was translated by native-language participating countries. Only registered members (subjects with confirmed cancer diagnosis) of the national patient oncology associations in each participating country were allowed to access and complete the online questionnaire (n = 16,458). Data were collected between October 2018 to February 2019. The Croatian Coalition of Health Associations enabled the authors of this paper to use the collected data from a sample of the Croatian participants (n = 2460) for the purposes of publication. Results: Two-thirds (67.3%) of the respondents reported satisfaction with the length of time needed for getting tests done. Bad news was delivered sensitively to 52.97% of the participants, and 52.76% received a cancer treatment plan. During the hospitalisation, 45.93% responded that they did not find someone from the hospital staff whom they could talk to about their worries and fears, and 57.48% were not given any contact information in case of concerns about their condition or treatment following the discharge. Regarding the patients’ preferences, needs, and values, 60.81% of the respondents felt that the greatest improvement would be to perform all services in one place, and 55.28% felt that improvement would be achieved through a multidisciplinary team coordinated by one person. Conclusions: The study reveals domains that need to be addressed in the overall Croatian healthcare system for oncology patients. Based on the obtained data, we can conclude that there is a large need for improvement in patient experience on the oncology pathway.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Karabatić & Andreja Šajnić & Sanja Pleština & Marko Jakopović & Biljana Kurtović, 2022. "Croatian National Cancer Patient Experience Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8285-:d:857399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8285-:d:857399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.