IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8279-d857278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microprocessor-Controlled Prostheses for a Bilateral Transtibial Amputee with Gait Analysis and Satisfaction: A 1-Year Followup Case Report

Author

Listed:
  • Jong Hu Jeon

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Hee Seung Yang

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Pyoung-hwa Choi

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Center of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Eui Jin Ahn

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Woo Sob Sim

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Center of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Dong Young Ahn

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Center of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Jin Yang Kim

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Center of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Seul Bin Na Lee

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Center of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Min Jo

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Center of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Seoul 05368, Korea)

  • Min Hee Cho

    (Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Center of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Seoul 05368, Korea)

Abstract

Bilateral amputees are disadvantaged as they lack healthy leg support. We present the rare case of a bilateral transtibial amputee (BTA), in which we compared the first South Korean-made microprocessor-controlled prosthesis (MPA) to a conventional prosthetic ankle (CPA) with gait analysis and a patient questionnaire for long-term outcomes. A 70-year-old man presented with bilateral transtibial amputations from injury. Assessments were performed after wearing an MPA for 1 month and 1 year with three-dimensional gait analysis. Satisfaction, mobility, and pain were evaluated using the Korean version of the Prostheses Evaluation Questionnaire (K-PEQ). The spatiotemporal parameters of both sides showed increased stability from the CPA to 1 month (mMPA) and 1 year (yMPA). We observed an increased single support time, decreased step width, and almost normal stance-swing time ratio. In kinematic parameters, the ankle range of motion (ROM) was bilaterally increased at mMPA and yMPA. Unfortunately, the MPA gait showed insufficient ankle plantarflexion during the terminal stance that failed to generate push-up power. As the MPA adaptation time increased, the symmetry ratio improved to a balanced value. The questionnaire-based investigations of satisfaction, mobility, and pain revealed excellent results. The MPA proved helpful for ankle mobility in the BTA, and the questionnaire showed good satisfaction and mobility in varied terrain.

Suggested Citation

  • Jong Hu Jeon & Hee Seung Yang & Pyoung-hwa Choi & Eui Jin Ahn & Woo Sob Sim & Dong Young Ahn & Jin Yang Kim & Seul Bin Na Lee & Min Jo & Min Hee Cho, 2022. "Microprocessor-Controlled Prostheses for a Bilateral Transtibial Amputee with Gait Analysis and Satisfaction: A 1-Year Followup Case Report," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8279-:d:857278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimas Adiputra & Ully Asfari & Ubaidillah & Mohd Azizi Abdul Rahman & Ahmad Mukifza Harun, 2023. "Immediate Effect Evaluation of a Robotic Ankle–Foot Orthosis with Customized Algorithm for a Foot Drop Patient: A Quantitative and Qualitative Case Report," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8279-:d:857278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.