IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p8154-d854748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Capacity Training on Environmental Health and Noncommunicable Diseases in the Country of Georgia: Challenges and Lessons Learned during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Carla J. Berg

    (Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Lela Sturua

    (Non-Communicable Diseases Department, National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, 0198 Tbilisi, Georgia)

  • Carmen J. Marsit

    (Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Levan Baramidze

    (International School of Public Health, Tbilisi State Medical University, 0177 Tbilisi, Georgia)

  • Nino Kiladze

    (International School of Public Health, Tbilisi State Medical University, 0177 Tbilisi, Georgia)

  • William Michael Caudle

    (Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

Abstract

COVID-19 presented challenges for global health research training programs. The Clean Air Research and Education (CARE) program, which aims to enhance research capacity related to noncommunicable diseases and environmental health in the country of Georgia, was launched in 2020—as the COVID-19 pandemic began. At its foundation is mentorship and mentored research, alongside formal didactic training, informal training/meetings, and other supports. Current analyses examined CARE’s initial 1.5 years (e.g., program benefits, mentorship relationships) using data from an evaluation survey among trainees and faculty in January 2022. Trainees (100% response rate: n = 12/12; 4 MPH, 8 PhD) and faculty (86.7% response rate: n = 13/15; 7 Georgia-based, 6 United States-based) rated factors related to mentor-mentee relationships highly, particularly mutual consideration of each other’s thoughts, opinions, and perspectives; one major challenge was completing goals planned. Trainees and faculty identified several growth experiences and program benefits (e.g., skills development, expanding professional network) but also identified challenges (e.g., meeting program demands, communication gaps, unclear expectations)—exacerbated by the pandemic. Findings underscore the importance of strong mentorship relationships and that the pandemic negatively impacted communication and clarity of expectations. Given the likely ongoing impact of the pandemic on such programs, program leaders must identify ways to address these challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla J. Berg & Lela Sturua & Carmen J. Marsit & Levan Baramidze & Nino Kiladze & William Michael Caudle, 2022. "Research Capacity Training on Environmental Health and Noncommunicable Diseases in the Country of Georgia: Challenges and Lessons Learned during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8154-:d:854748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michi Yukawa & Stuart A Gansky & Patricia O’Sullivan & Arianne Teherani & Mitchell D Feldman, 2020. "A new Mentor Evaluation Tool: Evidence of validity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8154-:d:854748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.