IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p8101-d853933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Amelia Gulliver

    (Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Alyssa R. Morse

    (Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Michelle Banfield

    (Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

Abstract

The value of including consumers’ and carers’ views at the early stages of study design is increasingly being recognised as essential to improving the relevance and quality of research. One method of achieving this is by actively seeking and regularly updating consumer and carer priorities for mental health research. The current study presents priorities for mental health research collected from two virtual World Cafés with consumers and carers ( n = 4, n = 7) held in 2021. Over 200 priorities were identified (13 themes, 64 subthemes), which were then compared with two combined data collection activities from 2013 (face-to-face forum; n = 25), and 2017 (online survey; n = 70). There appears to be some evolution in consumer and carer priorities over time. A key difference was that in the previous studies, mental health service issues were at the individual service delivery level, whereas in the current study, a broader focus was on mental health systems of care and issues around service funding, accessibility, and equity of access. It is possible these changes may also have resulted from key differences between the studies, including the methods, setting, and participants. Overall, similar to our previous studies no clear priorities were identified; however, a significant number of important research topics were identified by consumers and carers, providing a rich agenda from which to improve the management of mental health.

Suggested Citation

  • Amelia Gulliver & Alyssa R. Morse & Michelle Banfield, 2022. "Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8101-:d:853933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/8101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:8101-:d:853933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.