IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7902-d849477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences and the Influence of Body Composition on Land and Pool-Based Assessments of Anaerobic Power and Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Jacquelyn N. Zera

    (Department of Exercise Science and Sport Studies, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH 44118, USA)

  • Elizabeth F. Nagle

    (Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

  • Emma Connell

    (Veteran Affairs Puget Sound Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98108, USA)

  • Erin Curtin

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH 44118, USA)

  • Wilmina Marget

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH 44118, USA)

  • Anna P. Simonson

    (Department of Exercise Science and Sport Studies, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH 44118, USA)

  • Takashi Nagai

    (Sports Medicine Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA)

  • John Abt

    (Children’s Health Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, TX 75024, USA)

  • Scott Lephart

    (College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

Abstract

Consistent differences between males and females have been shown in land-based measurements of anaerobic power and capacity. However, these differences have not been investigated for a tethered 30-s maximal swimming test (TST). The purpose of this study is to explore gender differences in land and pool-based assessments of anaerobic power (F peak ) and capacity (F mean ), as well as the influence of body composition. Thirteen males and fifteen females completed land (Wingate (WAnT)) and pool-based (TST) measures of anaerobic power and capacity previously described in the literature. Additionally, the subjects completed assessments of body composition via air displacement plethysmography. The males produced higher force than the females for F peak ( p < 0.001) and F mean ( p = 0.008) during the TST. However, linear regression analysis determined that lean mass significantly predicted F peak ( p = 0.002) and F mean ( p < 0.001) during the TST, while gender was no longer significant ( p = 0.694 and p = 0.136, respectively). In conclusion, increases in anaerobic power and capacity (F peak and F mean ) may be a function of increased lean mass in males and females, warranting future research on the impact of resistance training programs on force production and swimming performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacquelyn N. Zera & Elizabeth F. Nagle & Emma Connell & Erin Curtin & Wilmina Marget & Anna P. Simonson & Takashi Nagai & John Abt & Scott Lephart, 2022. "Gender Differences and the Influence of Body Composition on Land and Pool-Based Assessments of Anaerobic Power and Capacity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-8, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7902-:d:849477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7902/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7902/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7902-:d:849477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.