IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7714-d846113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptability, Usability and Weight Loss Outcomes in a Randomized Cross-Over Study of Commercially Available Portion Size Tools in an Overweight South Asian Community

Author

Listed:
  • Basma Ellahi

    (Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH14BJ, UK)

  • Amanda Aitken

    (Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH14BJ, UK)

  • Derya Dikmen

    (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Turkey)

  • Bilge Seyhan-Erdoğan

    (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Turkey)

  • Munibah Makda

    (Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH14BJ, UK)

  • Rifat Razaq

    (Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH14BJ, UK)

Abstract

South Asian women living in the UK are particularly at high risk of obesity-related complications, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Exposure to large portion sizes is a risk factor for obesity. Specifically designed tableware helps individuals to manage weight by controlling food portion sizes. Thirty-one ( n = 31) overweight or obese South Asian adult women participated in a randomised cross-over trial aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptance, and weight change of two guided/calibrated commercially available portion control tools (Utensil set and Crockery Set) used in free-living conditions. Data on acceptance, perceived changes in portion size, frequency, and meal type was collected using paper questionnaires and 3-day diet diaries. Scores describing acceptance, ease of use, and perceived effectiveness were derived from five-point Likert scales from which binary indicators (high/low) were analysed for significance using multivariate variance analysis for repeated measurements. A reduction in BMI was observed at each point of measurement ( p = 0.007). For overall tool use, the crockery set scored higher in all areas of acceptance, ease of use, and perceived efficacy for all comparisons. Self-selected portion sizes increased for salads and decreased for cooking oil and breakfast cereals with both tools. Further research to scale up and evaluate similar weight management interventions for this group is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Basma Ellahi & Amanda Aitken & Derya Dikmen & Bilge Seyhan-Erdoğan & Munibah Makda & Rifat Razaq, 2022. "Acceptability, Usability and Weight Loss Outcomes in a Randomized Cross-Over Study of Commercially Available Portion Size Tools in an Overweight South Asian Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7714-:d:846113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7714-:d:846113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.