IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7655-d845511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability

Author

Listed:
  • Luiz Guilherme Telles

    (Physical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil
    Estácio de Sá University (UNESA), Rio de Janeiro 20261-063, Brazil)

  • François Billaut

    (Department of Kinesiology, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Aline de Souza Ribeiro

    (Physical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro 36036-900, Brazil)

  • Christian Geórgea Junqueira

    (Volta Redonda University Center, Rio de Janeiro 27240-560, Brazil)

  • Luís Leitão

    (Sciences and Technology Department, Superior School of Education of Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal
    Life Quality Research Centre, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal)

  • Ana Cristina Barreto

    (Celso Lisboa University Center, Rio de Janeiro 20950-092, Brazil)

  • Patricia Panza

    (Physical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro 36036-900, Brazil)

  • Jeferson Macedo Vianna

    (Physical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro 36036-900, Brazil)

  • Jefferson da Silva Novaes

    (Physical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil)

Abstract

Background: The application of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to resistance exercise has attracted some attention, owing to increases in muscle performance. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal occlusion pressure for this procedure. This study compared the acute effects of IPC with high and low pressure of occlusion on upper and lower limb maximal strength and heart rate variability in recreationally trained individuals. Methods: Sixteen recreationally trained men (25.3 ± 1.7 years; 78.4 ± 6.2 kg; 176.9 ± 5.4 cm; 25.1 ± 1.5 m 2 kg −1 ) were thoroughly familiarized with one repetition maximum (1 RM) testing in the following exercises: bench press (BP), front latissimus pull-down (FLPD), and shoulder press (SP) for upper limbs, and leg press 45º (LP45), hack machine (HM), and Smith Squat (SS) for lower limbs. The 1 RM exercises were then randomly performed on three separate days: after a high pressure (220 mmHg, IPC high ) and a low pressure (20 mmHg, IPC low ) IPC protocol and after no intervention (control, CON). Heart rate variability was also measured at rest, during and after the entire IPC protocol, and after the exercises. Results: Maximal strength was significantly ( p < 0.05) higher in both IPC high and IPC low compared with CON in all upper- and lower-limb exercises. There was no difference between the two experimental conditions. No significant differences were found in the comparison across the different experimental conditions for LF nu , HF nu , LF/HF ratio, and RMSSD ms . Conclusions: IPC performed with both high and low pressures influenced heart rate variability, which may partly explain the maximal strength enhancement.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiz Guilherme Telles & François Billaut & Aline de Souza Ribeiro & Christian Geórgea Junqueira & Luís Leitão & Ana Cristina Barreto & Patricia Panza & Jeferson Macedo Vianna & Jefferson da Silva Nova, 2022. "Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7655-:d:845511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7655/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7655/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7655-:d:845511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.