IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7611-d844578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Education: Patients’ Perspectives on Clinical Training and Informed Consent

Author

Listed:
  • Inês Gil-Santos

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Materno Infantil do Norte, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal)

  • Cristina Costa Santos

    (Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
    Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

  • Ivone Duarte

    (Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
    Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

There are complex ethical dilemmas inherent to medicine teaching, particularly in clinical practice involving actual patients. Questions must be raised on fulfilling medical students’ training needs while still respecting patients’ fundamental rights to autonomy and privacy. We aimed to assess patients’ perspectives regarding medical students’ involvement in their medical care. An observational, cross-sectional study was developed, and a questionnaire was applied randomly to patients waiting for a consultation/admitted to three distinct departments: General Surgery, Obstetrics/Gynaecology, and Infectious Diseases. Of the 77% interviewed patients who reported previous experiences with medical students, only 59% stated that they were asked for consent for their participation, and 28% stated that students had adequately introduced themselves. Patients from Gynaecology/Obstetrics were the ones who reported lower rates of these practices and were also the ones who were most bothered by students’ presence, stating that they would be more comfortable without the presence of medical students. Male patients received more explanations than female patients regarding the same matters. Thirty-five percent of patients stated that they would feel more comfortable without the medical students’ presence. The study shows a need to pay closer attention to fulfilling patients’ fundamental rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Inês Gil-Santos & Cristina Costa Santos & Ivone Duarte, 2022. "Medical Education: Patients’ Perspectives on Clinical Training and Informed Consent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7611-:d:844578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7611-:d:844578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.