IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7589-d844122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Lucie Lipková

    (Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Michal Kumstát

    (Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Ivan Struhár

    (Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Critical power represents an important parameter of aerobic function and is the highest average effort that can be sustained for a period of time without fatigue. Critical power is determined mainly in the laboratory. Many different approaches have been applied in testing methods, and it is a difficult task to determine which testing protocol it the most suitable. This review aims to evaluate all possible tests on bicycle ergometers or bicycles used to estimate critical power and to compare them. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) published from 2012 to 2022 and followed the PRISMA guidelines to process the review. Twenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria: records with trained or experienced endurance athletes (adults > 18), bicycle ergometer, a description of the testing protocol, and comparison of the tests. We found that the most widely used tests were the 3-min all-out tests set in a linear mode and the traditional protocol time to exhaustion. Some other alternatives could have been used but were not as regular. To summarize, the testing methods offered two main approaches in the laboratory (time to exhaustion test andthe 3-min all-out test with different protocols) and approach in the field, which is not yet completely standardized.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucie Lipková & Michal Kumstát & Ivan Struhár, 2022. "Determination of Critical Power Using Different Possible Approaches among Endurance Athletes: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7589-:d:844122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7589/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7589/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7589-:d:844122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.