IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7552-d843599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Number of Bacteria in Saliva in the Perioperative Period and Factors Associated with Increased Numbers

Author

Listed:
  • Yuki Sakamoto

    (Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka 5708507, Japan)

  • Arisa Tanabe

    (Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka 5708507, Japan)

  • Makiko Moriyama

    (Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka 5708507, Japan)

  • Yoshihiko Otsuka

    (Park Dental Clinic, Kanagawa 2510025, Japan)

  • Madoka Funahara

    (School of Oral Health Sciences, Kyusyu Dental University, Fukuoka 8038580, Japan)

  • Sakiko Soutome

    (Department of Oral Health, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 8528102, Japan)

  • Masahiro Umeda

    (Department of Clinical Oral Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical, Sciences, Nagasaki 8528102, Japan)

  • Yuka Kojima

    (Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka 5731191, Japan)

Abstract

Perioperative oral management is performed to prevent postoperative complications, but its indication and management method are unclear. This study aimed to investigate salivary bacterial counts pre-and postoperatively, and factors related to increased bacterial count postoperatively. We included 121 patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia and perioperative oral management. The bacterial count in saliva was determined preoperatively, and first and seventh days postoperatively using the dielectrophoresis and impedance measurement methods. The relationships between salivary bacterial count and various variables were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and multiple regression analysis. The salivary bacterial count increased significantly on the first day postoperatively but decreased on the seventh day. Multivariate analysis showed that age ( p = 0.004, standardized coefficient β = 0.283) and xerostomia ( p = 0.034, standardized coefficient β = 0.192) were significantly correlated with increased salivary bacterial count preoperatively. Salivary bacterial count on the day after surgery was significantly increased in patients with a large number of bacterial counts on the day before surgery after preoperative oral care ( p = 0.007, standardized coefficient β = 0.241) and postoperative fasting ( p = 0.001, standardized coefficient β = −0.329). Establishing good oral hygiene before surgery and decreasing salivary bacterial count are necessary in patients with a high risk of postoperative surgical site infection or pneumonia, especially in older adults or postoperative fasting.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuki Sakamoto & Arisa Tanabe & Makiko Moriyama & Yoshihiko Otsuka & Madoka Funahara & Sakiko Soutome & Masahiro Umeda & Yuka Kojima, 2022. "Number of Bacteria in Saliva in the Perioperative Period and Factors Associated with Increased Numbers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7552-:d:843599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7552-:d:843599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.