IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7407-d840688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foundation Level Barriers to the Widespread Adoption of Digital Solutions by Care Homes: Insights from Three Scottish Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Johnston

    (School of Health & Social Care, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, 9 Sighthill Court, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK)

  • Heidi Koikkalainen

    (School of Computing, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK)

  • Lynda Anderson

    (School of Health & Social Care, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, 9 Sighthill Court, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK)

  • Paul Lapok

    (School of Computing, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK)

  • Alistair Lawson

    (School of Computing, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK)

  • Susan D. Shenkin

    (Ageing and Health Research Group and Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK)

Abstract

The care home sector has great potential to benefit from technological innovations and to be at the forefront of developing novel digital solutions to improve the experiences of care home residents, their families, and the staff caring for them. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed variability in digital capabilities and longstanding data challenges within the care home sector. Paradoxically, however, it also increased the use of digital tools and services to support residents and staff. There are, however, a number of barriers to sustained and widespread adoption of digital solutions by care homes. Here, the focus is on foundation-level barriers and the groundwork required to overcome them. Using data from three Scottish-based studies, foundation-level barriers to the adoption of digital tools and services faced by care homes are discussed. These main barriers are the need for robust basic internet connectivity; capabilities for digital data collection; access to data to inform and drive digital solutions; the need for trust in the use of resident data by commercial companies; and the danger that poorly coordinated strategies undermine efforts to build a care home data platform and the digital solutions it can support. Sustained and widespread adoption of digital solutions by care homes will require these foundation-level barriers to be addressed. Strong and stable data and digital foundations supported by sector-specific scaffolding are major prerequisites to the widespread adoption of digital solutions by care homes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Johnston & Heidi Koikkalainen & Lynda Anderson & Paul Lapok & Alistair Lawson & Susan D. Shenkin, 2022. "Foundation Level Barriers to the Widespread Adoption of Digital Solutions by Care Homes: Insights from Three Scottish Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7407-:d:840688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7407/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7407/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frances Bunn & Claire Goodman & Kirsten Corazzini & Rachel Sharpe & Melanie Handley & Jennifer Lynch & Julienne Meyer & Tom Dening & Adam L Gordon, 2020. "Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes’ Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reena Devi & Adam Gordon & Tom Dening, 2022. "Enhancing the Quality of Care in Long-Term Care Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-3, January.
    2. Charlèss Dupont & Robrecht De Schreye & Joachim Cohen & Mark De Ridder & Lieve Van den Block & Luc Deliens & Kathleen Leemans, 2021. "Pilot Study to Develop and Test Palliative Care Quality Indicators for Nursing Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Sarah Damery & Sarah Flanagan & Janet Jones & Kate Jolly, 2021. "The Effect of Providing Staff Training and Enhanced Support to Care Homes on Care Processes, Safety Climate and Avoidable Harms: Evaluation of a Care Home Quality Improvement Programme in England," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7407-:d:840688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.