IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7360-d839682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of Recruit Training Demands and Subjective Wellbeing during Basic Military Training

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Bulmer

    (Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Jace R. Drain

    (Defence Science and Technology Group, Fishermans Bend 3207, Australia)

  • Jamie L. Tait

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Sean L. Corrigan

    (Centre for Sport Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Paul B. Gastin

    (La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3083, Australia)

  • Brad Aisbett

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Timo Rantalainen

    (Gerontology Research Centre and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland)

  • Luana C. Main

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

Abstract

Purpose: Assess and describe the physical demands and changes in subjective wellbeing of recruits completing the 12 week Australian Army Basic Military Training (BMT) course. Methods: Thirty-five recruits (24.8 ± 6.8 y; 177.4 ± 10.1 cm, 75.6 ± 14.7 kg) consented to daily activity monitoring and weekly measures of subjective wellbeing (Multi-component Training Distress Scale, MTDS). The physical demands of training were assessed via wrist worn activity monitors (Actigraph GT9X accelerometer). Physical fitness changes were assessed by push-ups, sit-ups and multi-stage shuttle run in weeks 2 and 8. Results: All objective and subjective measures significantly changed ( p < 0.05) across the 12 week BMT course. In parallel, there was a significant improvement in measures of physical fitness from weeks 2 to 8 ( p < 0.001). The greatest disturbance to subjective wellbeing occurred during week 10, which was a period of field training. Weeks 6 and 12 provided opportunities for recovery as reflected by improved wellbeing. Conclusions: The physical demands of training varied across the Australian Army 12 week BMT course and reflected the intended periodization of workload and recovery. Physical fitness improved from week 2 to 8, indicating a positive training response to BMT. Consistent with findings in sport, wellbeing measures were sensitive to fluctuations in training stress and appear to have utility for individual management of personnel in the military training environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Bulmer & Jace R. Drain & Jamie L. Tait & Sean L. Corrigan & Paul B. Gastin & Brad Aisbett & Timo Rantalainen & Luana C. Main, 2022. "Quantification of Recruit Training Demands and Subjective Wellbeing during Basic Military Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7360-:d:839682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7360/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7360/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sean Bulmer & Sean L. Corrigan & Jace R. Drain & Jamie L. Tait & Brad Aisbett & Spencer Roberts & Paul B. Gastin & Luana C. Main, 2022. "Characterising Psycho-Physiological Responses and Relationships during a Military Field Training Exercise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7360-:d:839682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.