IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7327-d839558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limitations and Recommendations for Advancing the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago S. Jesus

    (Center for Education in Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA)

  • Karthik Mani

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA)

  • Ritchard Ledgerd

    (World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), 1211 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Sureshkumar Kamalakannan

    (Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)

  • Sutanuka Bhattacharjya

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA)

  • Claudia von Zweck

    (World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), 1211 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • World Federation of Occupational Therapists

    (Membership of World Federation of Occupational Therapists is provided in the Acknowledgements.)

Abstract

Occupational therapy workforce research can help determine whether occupational therapists exist in sufficient supply, are equitably distributed, and meet competency standards. Advancing the value of occupational therapy workforce research requires an understanding of the limitations and recommendations identified by these investigations. This scoping review and content analysis synthesizes the study limitations and recommendations reported by the occupational therapy research worldwide. Two independent reviews included 57 papers from the past 25 years. Stated limitations included: focus on cross-sectional studies with small and convenience samples; participants from single settings or regions; local markets or preferences not specified; focus on self-reported data and intentions (rather than behaviors or occurrences); challenges in aggregating or synthesizing findings from descriptive data; lack of statistical adjustment for testing multiple associations; and the lack of detailed, up-to-date, and accessible workforce data for continuous monitoring and secondary research. Stated recommendations included: strengthening routine workforce data collection; developing longitudinal studies that include interventions (e.g., recruitment or retention packages); developing context-sensitive comparisons; studying the impact on ultimate outcomes; promoting nation-wide, coordinated workforce plans and requirements; and fostering international coalitions for workforce research and developments at scale. These study limitations and recommendations reported by the literature must be considered in the design of a local and global occupational therapy workforce research agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago S. Jesus & Karthik Mani & Ritchard Ledgerd & Sureshkumar Kamalakannan & Sutanuka Bhattacharjya & Claudia von Zweck & World Federation of Occupational Therapists, 2022. "Limitations and Recommendations for Advancing the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7327-:d:839558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7327-:d:839558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.