IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7237-d837737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Personalization in the User Experience, Preferences and Engagement with Virtual Reality Environments for Relaxation

Author

Listed:
  • Susanna Pardini

    (Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy
    Digital Health Lab, Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Silvia Gabrielli

    (Digital Health Lab, Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Marco Dianti

    (Digital Health Lab, Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Caterina Novara

    (Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Gesualdo M. Zucco

    (Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Palazzo del Capitanio, Piazza Capitaniato 3, 35139 Padova, Italy)

  • Ornella Mich

    (Center for Information and Communication Technology, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Stefano Forti

    (Digital Health Lab, Centre for Health and Wellbeing, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

Virtual Reality Environments (VREs) are widely deployed in mental health treatments, often associated with relaxation techniques. The personalization of natural VR-based scenarios is a key element that can further facilitate users’ sense of presence and relaxation. This study explored the role of VREs’ personalization in the user experience with an environment supporting relaxation, by deploying mixed methods. Methods: A non-clinical sample of 20 individuals participated in exposure to a supportive body-scan-guided relaxation VRE. In the personalized conditions, the participants had the option of choosing the context (e.g., sea, mountain, or countryside) and including in the scenario different types of sounds, visual elements, and changing the time of day and weather. In the standard conditions, individuals were exposed to a relaxing VRE, but they could choose neither the context nor the auditory and visual elements. The order of presentation of the personalized vs non-personalized environments was randomized. Measures regarding relaxation, state-anxiety perceived levels, VRE-related symptoms, the usability of the Virtual Reality (VR) setting, sense of presence, pleasure, activation, engagement, and level of immersion experienced were collected before and after exposure to the VR environments. Results: Findings showed that personalized VREs were preferred by users. Participants generally preferred to experience a greater immersivity, pleasure, engagement, and relaxation in the personalized virtual settings. Conclusion: The study further confirms the role of personalization as a component positively contributing to relaxation and engagement. Future research may further assess this effect in the context of large-scale controlled studies involving clinical and non-clinical populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanna Pardini & Silvia Gabrielli & Marco Dianti & Caterina Novara & Gesualdo M. Zucco & Ornella Mich & Stefano Forti, 2022. "The Role of Personalization in the User Experience, Preferences and Engagement with Virtual Reality Environments for Relaxation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7237-:d:837737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7237-:d:837737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.