IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7184-d836764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Seefeldt’s Proficiency Barrier: A Longitudinal Study

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Garbeloto dos Santos

    (CIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, R. Dr. Plácido da Costa 91, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

  • Matheus Maia Pacheco

    (CIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, R. Dr. Plácido da Costa 91, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

  • David Stodden

    (Department of Physical Education & Athletic Training, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Go Tani

    (School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, Av. Professor Mello Moraes, 65, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil)

  • José António Ribeiro Maia

    (CIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, R. Dr. Plácido da Costa 91, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The idea that proficiency in the fundamental movement skills (FMS) is necessary for the development of more complex motor skills (i.e., the proficiency barrier) and to promote health-enhancing physical activity and health-related physical fitness levels is widespread in the literature of motor development. Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study assessing whether children presenting proficiency below a specified proficiency barrier would demonstrate difficulty in improving performance in more complex skills—even when subjected to a period of practice in these complex skills. The present study tested this. Eighty-five normal children (44 boys) aged 7 to 10 years participated in the study. The intervention took place during 10 consecutive classes, once a week, lasting 40 min each. Six FMS (running, hopping, leaping, kicking, catching and stationary dribbling) and one transitional motor skill (TMS) (speed dribbling skill) were assessed. The results showed that only those who showed sufficient proficiency in running and stationary dribbling before the intervention were able to show high performance values in the TMS after intervention. In addition, in line with recent propositions, the results show that the basis for development of the TMS was specific critical components of the FMS and that the barrier can be captured through a logistic function. These results corroborate the proficiency barrier hypothesis and highlight that mastering the critical components of the FMS is a necessary condition for motor development.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Garbeloto dos Santos & Matheus Maia Pacheco & David Stodden & Go Tani & José António Ribeiro Maia, 2022. "Testing Seefeldt’s Proficiency Barrier: A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7184-:d:836764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernando Garbeloto & Bianca Miarka & Eduardo Guimarães & Fabio Rodrigo Ferreira Gomes & Fernando Ikeda Tagusari & Go Tani, 2023. "A New Developmental Approach for Judo Focusing on Health, Physical, Motor, and Educational Attributes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7184-:d:836764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.