IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7025-d834131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Meaningful Garden Space in a Care Home with Staff and Family Members: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Clarissa Giebel

    (Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK
    National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK)

  • Bram de Boer

    (Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Mark Gabbay

    (Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK
    National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK)

  • Caroline Watkins

    (National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK
    Applied Sciences for Health Hub, UCLAN, Preston PR1 2HE, UK)

  • Neil Wilson

    (Applied Sciences for Health Hub, UCLAN, Preston PR1 2HE, UK)

  • Hilary Tetlow

    (SURF Liverpool, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK)

  • Hilde Verbeek

    (Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Background: Care home residents are often passive and lack active engagement in meaningful activities. The aim of this qualitative study was to co-develop a plan for a meaningful garden space in an urban care home in the north of England, to inform the subsequent building of such a garden space on the care home premises. Methods: Members of staff participated in focus groups conducted at the care home. Family carers were interviewed by telephone. Both focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded, with transcripts analysed independently using thematic analysis by two researchers, and consensus achieved on final themes. Findings: Two focus groups with staff (n = 17) and seven interviews with family carers were held. Thematic analysis generated seven key themes for the garden about its meaning and environmental features: (1) Current opinions on physical environment; (2) access; (3) adaptation to the environment; (4) staffing; (5) socialising; (6) sensory features; and (7) active meaningful participation. The garden needed to be accessible to residents in wheelchairs, and in all weathers and seasonal conditions, as well as being adapted to the needs of people living with dementia. Areas for social activities, such as picnics, and intergenerational activities, as well as private spaces, were recommended. Throughout the garden, sensory features were suggested, incorporating the use of vision, smell, touch, and sound, such as through water features. Moreover, it was recommended that residents should be able to contribute to the delivery of the activities themselves, including through a café and a vegetable garden. Conclusions: Family carers and staff considered that the garden would benefit from an intensive update to meet the needs of residents. This study therefore has practical implications for care home design, which are of even greater importance since the pandemic, as outdoor spaces were considered safer for care home visiting.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarissa Giebel & Bram de Boer & Mark Gabbay & Caroline Watkins & Neil Wilson & Hilary Tetlow & Hilde Verbeek, 2022. "Developing a Meaningful Garden Space in a Care Home with Staff and Family Members: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7025-:d:834131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7025/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7025/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benedicte S Strøm & Siri Ytrehus & Ellen‐Karine Grov, 2016. "Sensory stimulation for persons with dementia: a review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 1805-1834, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:thr:techub:10026:y:2021:i:1:p:514-526 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rosa Redolat & Mercedes Fernandez-Rios, 2021. "Therapeutic robots as a technological intervention in residential environments for older adults: Uses, limitations and ethical concerns," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 514-526, Decembrie.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7025-:d:834131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.