IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7004-d833718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlational Study of Emotional Stress, Pain, and the Presence of Inpatient Companions for Cancer Inpatients during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Ya-Huei Chen

    (Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Ling Chen

    (Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung 433304, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Hui Chang

    (Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan)

  • Pi-O Wu

    (Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan)

  • Hsiu-Hui Yu

    (Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan)

  • Sou-Jen Shih

    (Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan)

  • Mei-Yu Chang

    (Department of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan)

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 poses an immense global threat. Visitors to hospitalized patients during a pandemic might themselves be carriers, and so hospitals strictly control patients and inpatient companions. However, it is not easy for cancer patients to adjust the times of their medical treatment or to suspend treatment, and the impact of the pandemic on cancer inpatients and inpatient companions is relatively high. The objectives for this investigation are to study the correlations among emotional stress, pain, and the presence of inpatient companions in cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was a retrospective descriptive study. The participants were cancer inpatients and inpatient companions in a medical center in Taiwan. The data for this study were extracted from cross-platform structured and normalized electronic medical record databases. Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS version 22.0 were used for analysis of the data. In all, 75.15% of the cancer inpatients were accompanied by family, and the number of hospitalization days were 7.87 ± 10.77 days, decreasing year by year, with statistical significance of p < 0.001. The daily nursing hours were 12.94 ± 10.76, and the nursing hours decreased year by year, p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in gender among those who accompanied the patients, but there were statistical differences in the length of hospitalization, nursing hours, and pain scores between those with and without inpatient companions, with p < 0.001. The inpatient companions were mostly family members (78%). The findings of this study on cancer patient care and inpatient companions should serve as an important basis for the transformation and reform of the inpatient companion culture and for epidemic prevention care in hospitals.

Suggested Citation

  • Ya-Huei Chen & Shu-Ling Chen & Chia-Hui Chang & Pi-O Wu & Hsiu-Hui Yu & Sou-Jen Shih & Mei-Yu Chang, 2022. "Correlational Study of Emotional Stress, Pain, and the Presence of Inpatient Companions for Cancer Inpatients during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7004-:d:833718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shiva Khaleghparast & Soodabeh Joolaee & Behrooz Ghanbari & Majid Maleki & Hamid Peyrovi & Naser Bahrani, 2016. "A Review of Visiting Policies in Intensive Care Units," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 267-267, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7004-:d:833718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.