IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6952-d832748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Kinematic and Kinetic Responses of the Trunk and Lower Extremity Joints during Walking with and without the Spinal Orthosis

Author

Listed:
  • Chenyan Wang

    (College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Xiaona Li

    (College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Yuan Guo

    (College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Weijin Du

    (College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Hongmei Guo

    (College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Weiyi Chen

    (College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

Abstract

Spinal orthoses are an effective option for restoring the spine to its original position and controlling poor posture. However, the effects of poor posture and spinal orthoses on the kinematics and kinetics of trunk and lower extremity joints remain unclear. A six-camera Vicon motion capture system and two AMTI force plates were employed to collect gait parameters, including joint angle (spine, thorax, hip, knee, and ankle), range of motion (ROM), and ground reaction forces (GRFs). Furthermore, joint moments and joint reaction forces (JRFs) were calculated using a full-body musculoskeletal model in OpenSim. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA ( p < 0.05) was used to compare significant differences among three trial conditions. These three conditions were walking in a normal posture, poor posture, and spinal orthosis. The results showed that spine ROM in the coronal and transverse plane was significantly lower when walking with a spinal orthosis compared to walking in normal and poor posture ( p < 0.05). Compared to normal posture, the lumbar moments and back compressive forces were significantly increased when walking in poor posture ( p < 0.05). However, when walking with a spinal orthosis, there was a significant decrease in trunk moments and reaction forces compared to walking in poor posture ( p < 0.05). Individuals with poor posture could potentially induce instability and disorders, as evidenced by an increase in trunk moments and JRF compared to the normal posture. Spinal orthosis not only restricts spine ROM but also reduces the load on the spine and thus increases balance and stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenyan Wang & Xiaona Li & Yuan Guo & Weijin Du & Hongmei Guo & Weiyi Chen, 2022. "The Kinematic and Kinetic Responses of the Trunk and Lower Extremity Joints during Walking with and without the Spinal Orthosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6952-:d:832748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6952/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6952/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno L. S. Bedo & Alice Mantoan & Danilo S. Catelli & Willian Cruaud & Monica Reggiani & Mario Lamontagne, 2021. "BOPS: a Matlab toolbox to batch musculoskeletal data processing for OpenSim," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1104-1114, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6952-:d:832748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.