IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6928-d832351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prostate Cancer Eligible for Radical Prostatectomy: Self-Esteem of Patients and Forms of Coping with Stress

Author

Listed:
  • Edyta Skwirczyńska

    (Department of History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Oskar Wróblewski

    (Doctoral School, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Karol Tejchman

    (Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Piotr Ostrowski

    (Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Natalia Serwin

    (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the strategies and styles of coping with stress and self-esteem in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. One hundred and five patients with prostate cancer participated in the study. Coping strategies were assessed with the Mini-Cope questionnaire, coping styles were assessed with the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, and self-esteem was assessed with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Patients’ self-esteem and stress coping styles and strategies were analyzed using a Pearson correlation analysis. A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of self-esteem. The self-esteem level was positively related to the task-focused style ( r = 0.228) and negatively related to the emotion-focused style ( r = −0.329). The self-esteem level was significantly positively related to the strategies of active coping ( r = 0.358), planning ( r = 0.355), and seeking emotional support ( r = 0.319) and was negatively related to self-blaming ( r = −0.448) and to substance use ( r = −0.301). The predictors of self-esteem level were: the strategies of self-blaming, planning, and the support-seeking dimension (F(3, 95) = 17.65; p < 0.001), explaining 33.8% of the variability in subjects’ self-esteem level. The moderating effect of age occurred in patients up to 65 years; it was statistically insignificant in patients older than 65 years. Replacement of the self-blame strategy and the emotion-focused style may lead to higher self-esteem of patients. The level of self-esteem can predict the strategies of self-blaming, planning, and the dimension of seeking support. For patients up to 65 years, psychological support should include reinforcement of adaptive forms of coping.

Suggested Citation

  • Edyta Skwirczyńska & Oskar Wróblewski & Karol Tejchman & Piotr Ostrowski & Natalia Serwin, 2022. "Prostate Cancer Eligible for Radical Prostatectomy: Self-Esteem of Patients and Forms of Coping with Stress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6928-:d:832351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6928-:d:832351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.