IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6799-d830249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Biological Drugs for Psoriasis: A Drug-Utilization Study Using Tuscan Administrative Databanks

Author

Listed:
  • Sabrina Giometto

    (Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Silvia Tillati

    (Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Laura Baglietto

    (Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Nicola De Bortoli

    (Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Marta Mosca

    (Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Marco Conte

    (CESP, U1018 INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Hôpital Paul Brousse Bâtiment 15/16, CEDEX, 94807 Villejuif, France)

  • Marco Tuccori

    (Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
    Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Rosa Gini

    (Tuscan Regional Healthcare Agency, 50141 Florence, Italy)

  • Ersilia Lucenteforte

    (Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

Our study aims at providing evidence on patterns of use of biologic drugs for psoriasis in Tuscany, Italy. We conducted a drug-utilization study based on administrative databanks of Tuscany (EUPAS45365) from 2011 to 2019. We selected new users of etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, or secukinumab between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016. We considered subjects with psoriasis and followed subjects until the end of the study period (three years after the first dispensation of biologic drug for psoriasis) or the patient’s death, whichever came first. We censored subjects for pregnancy or neoplasia. For each subject, we defined the state as the weekly coverage of one of the biologic drugs of interest. We then defined the switch as the change from a state to another one. A total of 7062 subjects with a first dispensation of a PSObio drug in the inclusion period was identified, and 1839 (52.9% female, 51.6 mean age) patients were included in the analysis. Among new users of adalimumab (N = 770, 41.9%), one third showed a continuous behaviour whereas the others moved to etanercept and ustekinumab. New users of etanercept (N = 758, 41.2%), had the highest proportion of switchers, with adalimumab most often being the second choice. New users of infliximab (N = 159, 8.6%) experienced the highest proportion of treatment discontinuation. The present study suggests that the majority of patients treated with PSObio drugs do not switch from one active ingredient to another. However, patients who started biological therapy with etanercept had the highest frequency of switching to other PSObio drugs, whereas those who started with secukinumab or ustekinumab had the lowest.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabrina Giometto & Silvia Tillati & Laura Baglietto & Nicola De Bortoli & Marta Mosca & Marco Conte & Marco Tuccori & Rosa Gini & Ersilia Lucenteforte, 2022. "Use of Biological Drugs for Psoriasis: A Drug-Utilization Study Using Tuscan Administrative Databanks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6799-:d:830249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6799/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6799/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6799-:d:830249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.