IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6735-d829040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of Informed Consent in Mammography Screening—The Polish Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Zagaja

    (Chair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Renata Bogusz

    (Chair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Jarosław Sak

    (Chair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

  • Michał Wiechetek

    (Institute of Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Jakub Pawlikowski

    (Chair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the leading forms of cancers in women worldwide. In Poland, it accounts for approx. 20% of all cancers diagnosed, with approximately 11,000 new cases and 5000 deaths from this disease annually. To prevent unfavourable statistics, Poland introduced free breast cancer screening programmes, available to women aged 50–69. Over a million women take advantage of this programme each year. The aim of the research was to assess the quality of consent women give prior to mammography screening and address the question of whether this quality is sufficient to make an informed choice. The study was conducted on a representative group of 600 Polish women over 50 years old (475 of them had undergone mammography screening), who agreed to take part in the study. Using the computer-assisted interview technology (CATI) method, all women were asked about their perception of breast cancer and screening and those who had undergone mammography were quizzed about the consent process. They will form the focus of this research. The validated tool contained items on both the benefits and risks of screening. The results indicate that the quality of informed consent was insufficient. A discrepancy was observed in the awareness between the benefits and risks of mammography screening. The main motivations to undergo screening were: prophylactic purposes and the free-of-charge nature of this health service. Population-based screening programmes for breast cancer should be reconsidered in terms of information policy, and the quality of informed consent should be increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Zagaja & Renata Bogusz & Jarosław Sak & Michał Wiechetek & Jakub Pawlikowski, 2022. "Quality of Informed Consent in Mammography Screening—The Polish Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6735-:d:829040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6735-:d:829040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.