IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p6321-d821709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • V. Lozano-Berrio

    (Biomechanics and Technical Aids Department, National Hospital for Spinal Cord Injury, 45004 Toledo, Spain)

  • M. Alcobendas-Maestro

    (Biomechanics and Technical Aids Department, National Hospital for Spinal Cord Injury, 45004 Toledo, Spain)

  • B. Polonio-López

    (Technological Innovation Applied to Health Research Group (ITAS), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45600 Talavera de la Reina, Spain)

  • A. Gil-Agudo

    (Biomechanics and Technical Aids Department, National Hospital for Spinal Cord Injury, 45004 Toledo, Spain)

  • A. de la Peña-González

    (Occupational Therapy Unit, National Hospital for Spinal Cord Injury, 45004 Toledo, Spain)

  • A. de los Reyes-Guzmán

    (Biomechanics and Technical Aids Department, National Hospital for Spinal Cord Injury, 45004 Toledo, Spain)

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of robotic therapy in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), measured on the basis of the patients’ self-perception of limited upper limb function and level of independence in activities of daily living. Methods: Twenty-six patients with cervical SCI completed the treatment after being randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The training consisted of 40 experimental sessions 1 h in duration, ideally occurring 5 days/week for 8 weeks. In addition to the conventional daily therapy (30 min), the control group received another 30 min of conventional therapy, whereas the intervention group received 30 min of robotic therapy. Patients were evaluated by means of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) clinical scales. Results: The improvement in the feeding item of SCIM was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group after the treatment (2.00 (0.91) vs. 1.18 (0.89), p = 0.03). The correlation between the CUE and SCIM scales was higher at the ending than at baseline for both groups. Conclusions: Although both groups improved, the clinical relevance related to the changes observed for both assessments was slightly higher in the intervention group than in the control group.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Lozano-Berrio & M. Alcobendas-Maestro & B. Polonio-López & A. Gil-Agudo & A. de la Peña-González & A. de los Reyes-Guzmán, 2022. "The Impact of Robotic Therapy on the Self-Perception of Upper Limb Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6321-:d:821709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6321/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6321/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6321-:d:821709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.